The relation between disciplinary concepts of originality and practical orientations for data sharing

原创性学科概念与数据共享实践导向之间的关系

• 批准号: 347305329
• 负责人: Professorin Dr. Eva Barlösius
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Institut für Soziologie
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2017
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2016-12-31 至 2020-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/347305329?language=en
• 关键词: relation; between; disciplinary; concepts; originality

The project departs from the assumption that a link between the concepts of scientific originality and the practical orientations for data sharing exists, which is constituted by the aspiration for scientific reputation. Studies on scientific originality have shown that the awarding of scientific reputation depends on, that the generated scientific knowledge is recognized as original. This link has neither been analyzed nor proven yet, however, this assumption is supported by some indicators: for instance researchers name as main reason why they do not share their data, that this practice would not be rewarded with scientific reputation. Moreover researchers state that they would not pass the data until this resource cannot be longer used for good publications, that means for increasing their scientific reputation. On the other hand data is shared if this gift increases the prospects for generating original scientific knowledge. The concepts of originality differ according to discipline-specific characteristics, as own empirical studies show. These could be an important reason for the disciplinary differences regarding data sharing.

该项目偏离了科学原创性概念与数据共享的实际方向之间存在联系的假设，这种联系是由对科学声誉的渴望构成的。 对科学原创性的研究表明，科学声誉的授予取决于所产生的科学知识被认为是原创的。这种联系尚未得到分析或证明，然而，这种假设得到了一些指标的支持：例如，研究人员指出他们不分享数据的主要原因是，这种做法不会获得科学声誉。此外，研究人员表示，他们不会通过数据，直到这些资源不能再用于良好的出版物，这意味着增加他们的科学声誉。 另一方面，如果这种天赋增加了产生原创科学知识的前景，那么数据就是共享的。 原创性的概念不同，根据学科的具体特点，作为自己的实证研究表明。这可能是数据共享方面学科差异的重要原因。

项目成果

Concepts of Originality in the Natural Science, Medical, and Engineering Disciplines: An Analysis of Research Proposals

• DOI: 10.1177/0162243918808370
• 发表时间: 2019-11-01
• 期刊: SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES
• 影响因子: 3.1
• 作者: Barloesius, Eva

Regeln zum Umgang mit Forschungsdaten und die Wissenschaftsfreiheit

处理研究数据和学术自由的规则

• DOI: 10.3790/rth.50.2.203
• 发表时间: 2020
• 期刊: Rechtstheorie
• 作者: Friederike Knoke;Eva Barlösius
• 通讯作者: Eva Barlösius

The intertwining of reputation and sharing – The significance of standardization in preparing research data and the impact of project organization

声誉与共享的交织 â 标准化在准备研究数据中的意义以及项目组织的影响

• DOI: 10.1051/itmconf/20203301002
• 发表时间: 2020
• 期刊: ITM Web of Conferences
• 作者: Saskia-Rabea Schrade