How reading mode, expertise, and disorders affect phonological and semantic processing in reading: investigations using eye movements during silent and oral reading, comparing developing, deaf, dyslexic, and normal readers, making use of special propertie

阅读模式、专业知识和障碍如何影响阅读中的语音和语义处理：在默读和口头阅读期间使用眼动进行调查，比较发育中的、聋哑的、阅读困难的和正常的读者，利用特殊属性

基本信息

批准号：
251103812
负责人：
Dr. Jochen Laubrock
金额：
--
依托单位：
Lehrstuhl Trainings- und Bewegungswissenschaft
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2014
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2013-12-31 至 2016-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/251103812?language=en
关键词：
How reading mode expertise disorders

项目摘要

We aim at investigating phonological and semantic processing in silent and oral reading, comparing skilled, developing, dyslexic, and deaf readers, using eye movement measures. We will compare (a) deaf, dyslexic and normal readers; (b) silent and oral reading; (c) younger and older readers in order to gain a better understanding of developmental aspects of the reading process and of problems therein. We will use features of the Chinese and German languages and writing systems that are particularly suited to explore these differences, thereby providing test data for computational models of eye movements during reading and for models of reading aloud.We will research reading dynamics with the following program, focusing on foveal and parafoveal differences in semantic and phonological information processing. We will conduct two series of new studies to address parafoveal processing in oral and silent reading. In the first line, we will collect data from oral and silent reading using the boundary paradigm. We will manipulate the semantic and phonological relatedness of the target word and the preview word. This allows us to test the relative weighting of semantic and phonological information in different reading modes. We predict that phonological PB will be more pronounced in oral than in silent reading, and reading aloud will reduce semantic PB in Chinese. To our knowledge, no published study has used the boundary paradigm to compare parafoveal processing in silent and oral reading. In the second line of studies, we use the moving-window paradigm to investigate the perceptual span in both reading modes. We collect new reading data from different populations such as adults using different languages, normal-developing children, and dyslexic readers. This will allow us to address issues such as the relative importance of parafoveal information and the attentional span in normal children and dyslexics. Furthermore, readers of Chinese script tend to have faster access to semantics than to phonology, whereas readers of a fairly transparent alphabetic orthography such as German tend to have faster access to phonology than to semantics. By comparing the perceptual span in oral and silent reading of matched material between languages we hope to further investigate language differences in oral and silent reading and learn about whether and how the relative weighting of semantics and phonology in different scripts supports lexical and sublexical processing.Besides these two new series of research, we will also collect data from deaf readers, aiming at testing how they use the phonetic radicals of Chinese compound characters. By testing phonetic combinability and consistency effects, we investigate whether the phonetic radical is used phonologically or orthographically during lexical access. By testing the semantic combinability and phonetic consistency effects we investigate whether the phonetic radical can be used semantically.

我们旨在使用眼动措施来调查无声和口头阅读中的语音和语义处理，比较熟练，发育，阅读障碍和聋哑读者。我们将比较（a）聋，阅读障碍和正常读者；（b）沉默和口头阅读；（c）年轻的和年龄较大的读者，以更好地了解阅读过程的发展方面及其中的问题。我们将使用中文和德语的特征以及特别适合探索这些差异的写作系统，从而为阅读过程中的眼动计算模型提供了测试数据。我们将通过以下程序研究阅读动力学，重点介绍了语义和语音信息处理方面的绒毛和偏头痛差异。我们将进行两项新的研究，以解决口头和无声阅读中的Parafoveal处理。在第一行中，我们将使用边界范式从口头和无声阅读中收集数据。我们将操纵目标单词和预览单词的语义和语音相关性。这使我们能够在不同的阅读模式下测试语义和语音信息的相对权重。我们预测，语音PB在口头中比在静默阅读中更为明显，并且大声朗读将减少中文的语义PB。据我们所知，尚无公开的研究使用边界范式比较静音和口头阅读中的偏羊角处理。在第二行研究中，我们使用移动窗口范式来研究两种读取模式中的感知跨度。我们从不同人群中收集新的阅读数据，例如使用不同的语言，正常发育的儿童和阅读障碍的读者收集新的阅读数据。这将使我们能够解决诸如parafoveal信息的相对重要性以及正常儿童和阅读障碍者的注意力跨度。此外，中文脚本的读者倾向于比语音学更快地获得语义的访问，而诸如德语等相当透明的字母拼字法的读者往往比语义学更快地获得了语音学的访问。通过比较语言之间匹配材料的口头和无声阅读中的感知跨度，我们希望进一步研究口头和无声阅读中的语言差异，并了解不同脚本中语义和语音学的相对权重是否以及如何支持词汇和soblexical Processing.Besides。贝斯德（Beside）这两个新系列的研究，我们还将从聋哑人的角色中收集这些新系列的研究，旨在测试聋哑人的数据。通过测试语音组合性和一致性效应，我们研究了语音自由基在词汇访问期间是否在语音上或拼写上使用。通过测试语义组合性和语音一致性效应，我们研究了语音自由基是否可以在语义上使用。