Marx and the "criticism in a hand-to-hand fight". Towards a geneaology of a modern critique of society

在其谱系方法的基础上，手头的研究项目迄今为止已经得出了两个至关重要的发现：首先，马克思的社会批判确实一直是在肉搏战中并通过肉搏战进行的；其次，这种肉搏战，也就是说，在对手星座中对理论和思想的政治部署，是马克思社会批判的构成特征。到目前为止，这个项目的目的是揭示马克思主义社会批判与肉搏战之间不可磨灭的交织。在继续该项目的原则框架的同时，新的研究视角现在旨在探索这种洞察力对马克思社会批判的全面真理主张的后果和影响。因此，这个项目的新的基本问题是：当一方面它作为一种社会历史运动的党派真理政治来执行，另一方面它必须作为这个运动的喉舌为整个社会主张一种全面的和革命的真理时，它对社会批判的形态意味着什么？参考先前的研究成果，该项目将把这个问题应用于构成和构成马克思社会批判的三个主要媒体或实践领域：政治组织领域、新闻实践领域和科学理论领域。

On the basis of its genealogical approach the research project at hand has so far carved out two crucial findings: firstly, that the social critique of Marx is indeed consistently exercised in and through a hand-to-hand fight and secondly, that this hand-to-hand fight, that is, the political deployment of a theory and a thinking in adversary constellations, is the constitutive characteristic of Marxian social critique. Up to now the aim of the project was to reveal this indelible intertwinement of the Marxian social critique with the hand-to-hand fight. In continu-ing the principle framework of the project, the new research perspective aims now to explore the consequences and effects of this insight on the comprehensive claim of truth of Marx´s social critique. Consequently, the new basic question of the project is: What does it mean for the shape of a social critique when on the one hand it is performed as a partisan politics of truth for a socio-historical movement and on the other hand it has to claim a comprehensive and revolutionary truth for the whole of society precisely as a mouthpiece of this movement? Referring to the previous research results, the project will apply this question to those three leading fields of media or practices by which the social critique of Marx is constituted and composed: the field of political organization, the field of journalistic practices, and the field of scientific theory.