Aporias of subjectivation. On the appropriation and negotiation of discursive subject positions via a further development of the documentary method at the example of occupational socialization in the realm of professional politics and arts

直到今天，在定性研究中还没有系统地考虑集体知识结构的规范性。该项目的主要目标是进一步发展记录方法，以便重建这种知识结构(霸权主体地位)，这种结构不是追溯到共同的经验空间(如环境或世代)，而是话语--根据共同的经验空间获得不同相关性的话语--霸权命令。因此，纪录片主观化分析的目的是重建主体地位与自反性和非自反性知识结构之间的相互作用，这些结构由(专业)传记和特定环境导向指导，从而缩小研究差距。方法-方法论目标通过关于政治和艺术领域职业社会化的定性、横截面数据(访谈、与年轻专业人员的小组讨论)具体化。这种对比--作为理论抽样的一部分--是基于这样的假设，即它特别是一个真实自我的主体地位，即由专业人士协商和适当。这一职位以及其他具有霸权地位的职位将通过分析小组讨论的方式进行经验确定，然后通过访谈分析加以确认，访谈分析还允许根据(职业)传记和(或)环境重建与不同经验领域相关的不同形式的谈判和挪用主题职位。从而揭示了主观化的模式和缺失，既没有在定性调查中详细观察，也没有在职业社会化研究的背景下详细观察到。该项目旨在从本质上理解为定性研究方法及其方法论的进一步发展，并有助于政治和艺术领域的职业社会化调查，特别考虑总体身份规范和相应的霸权学科地位。

Until today, the normative character of collective structures of knowledge is not considered systematically in qualitative research. The main objective of this project is grounded in a further development of the Documentary Method allowing the reconstruction of such knowledge structures (hegemonic subject positions) which do not trace back to mutually shared spaces of experience (such as milieu or generation) but to discursive-hegemonic imperatives which gain different relevance according to shared spaces of experience. Thus, it is the aim of a Documentary Subjectivation Analysis to reconstruct the interaction of subject positions and reflexive as well as non-reflexive structures of knowledge which are guided by (professional-) biographical and milieu-specific orientations; thereby a research gap can be closed.The methodical-methodological aims are concretized by means of qualitative, cross-sectional data (interviews, group discussions with young professionals) concerning the occupational socialization in the domains of politics and arts. This contrast is - as part of a theoretical sampling - based on the assumption that it is especially the subject position of an authentic self which is to negotiate and appropriate by professionals. This as well as other hegemonic subject positions are to identify empirically by means of the analysis of group discussions, they are then to validate via interview analysis which also allows the reconstruction of different forms of negotiation and appropriation of subject positions which are related to different spaces of experience according to (occupational) biographies and/ or milieus. Thereby patterns and aporia of subjectivation are revealed having been observed in detail neither in qualitative inquity nor in the context of research on occupational socialization. The project is to understand essentially as a further development of qualitative research methods and their methodology and contributes to the investigation of occupational socialization in politics and arts with the special consideration of totalizing identity norms and according hegemonic subject positions.