权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Moving in time and space – Do (a)symmetric time-space mappings depend on modality-specific processing?

时间和空间的移动â（a）对称时空映射是否依赖于特定模态的处理？

基本信息

批准号：
256549680
负责人：
Professor Dr. Rouwen Cañal Bruland
金额：
--
依托单位：
Abteilung Leistungspsychologie
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2014
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2013-12-31 至 2019-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/256549680?language=en
关键词：
Moving time space Do symmetric

项目摘要

Embodied cognition accounts submit that cognitive representations such as representations of time and space and movements mutually modulate each other. Yet, two conflicting theories provide alternative explanations as to how this modulation is effectuated. According to the asymmetry hypothesis movements influence spatial representations, which then influence temporal representations. Therefore, with respect to time-space mappings, the asymmetry hypothesis predicts that spatial representations have a larger impact on temporal representations than temporal representations on spatial representations. In contrast, A Theory of Magnitude (ATOM) advocates that time and space are processed by a shared magnitude system that develops through movement. Consequently, with respect to time-space mappings, the ATOM hypothesis proposes that temporal and spatial representations impact each other equally. While both theoretical approaches have received empirical support, closer inspection reveals that this may – in part – be due to the relative contribution of different modalities to finding task-appropriate solutions. It is well known that the processing of time and space is differently sensitive within the different modalities. For instance, auditory information processing is more sensitive to temporal than spatial information, whereas visual information processing is more sensitive to spatial than temporal information. It follows that a proper test of either hypothesis needs to control for relative contributions of different modalities for task-appropriate solutions. To this end, the aim of the proposed research project is to systematically manipulate the relative informational value of different modalities for tasks that require accurate temporal and spatial representations (i.e. catching a ball). The unique contribution of this research project is a critical test of the asymmetry hypothesis against ATOM from an embodied cognition perspective, thereby fundamentally increasing our understanding how interactions between movements and space-time mappings are modulated by modality-specific processing.

具身认知理论认为，诸如时间、空间和运动的表征等认知表征相互调节。然而，两种相互冲突的理论提供了关于这种调制是如何实现的替代解释。根据不对称假说，运动影响空间表征，进而影响时间表征。因此，就时空映射而言，不对称假设预测空间表征对时间表征的影响大于时间表征对空间表征的影响。相比之下，数量级理论（ATOM）主张时间和空间是由一个通过运动发展起来的共享数量级系统来处理的。因此，就时间-空间映射而言，ATOM假设提出时间和空间表示相互平等地影响。虽然这两种理论方法都得到了经验的支持，但更仔细的检查表明，这可能部分是由于不同的模式对寻找适合任务的解决方案的相对贡献。众所周知，在不同的模态中，时间和空间的处理是不同的敏感。例如，听觉信息处理对时间信息比空间信息更敏感，而视觉信息处理对空间信息比时间信息更敏感。因此，对任何一种假设的适当检验都需要控制不同模式对任务适当解决方案的相对贡献。为此，拟议的研究项目的目的是系统地操纵不同模式的相对信息价值，以完成需要准确的时间和空间表征的任务（如接球）。本研究项目的独特贡献是从具身认知的角度对ATOM的不对称假设进行了关键测试，从而从根本上增加了我们对运动和时空映射之间的相互作用如何被模态特定处理调制的理解。