课题基金 / 基金详情

Child Theology and everyday practices in classrooms. A reconstructive analysis concerning the relationship between the normative program of Child Theology and the implicit rules and norms inherent in routines in Religious Education

Child Theology and everyday practices in classrooms. A reconstructive analysis concerning the relationship between the normative program of Child Theology and the implicit rules and norms inherent in routines in Religious Education
儿童神学和课堂上的日常实践。
批准号:
270188357
负责人:
Professorin Dr. Hanna Roose
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位国家:
德国
项目类别:
Research Grants
财政年份:
2014
资助国家:
德国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2013-12-31 至 2017-12-31

项目摘要

项目成果

Professorin Dr. Hanna Roose的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
The pedagogical program of Child Theology has been widely established during the last 10 years. However, the program has not yet been implemented into everyday lessons of Religious Education (R.E.) on a larger scale. The project focusses on this aspect of implementation and asks how the normative program of Child Theology relates to those rules and norms which can be observed in the practices of R.E. lessons. The project interprets videotaped scenes from R.E. lessons from two different perspectives. The first perspective is inspired by the program of Child Theology. It looks for examples of good practice and regards the norms of Child Theology as criteria of this good practice. The second perspective is informed by the practice turn. This perspective suspends the question of good practice and tries to reconstruct the rules and norms which are inherent in those practices which are constitutive of R.E. lessons. Practices are defined as routines in a social field that are taken for granted by its participants. Incidents which, from the perspective of Child Theology, might be interpreted as missed chances, indicative of deficits in the teachers professional capacities, can thus be described as incidents of conflicting norms. The aims of the project are threefold: First, it analyses how much Child Theology there can be found in everyday R.E. lessons. Second, it elucidates some of the taken-for-granted apects of R.E. lessons. Third, it describes potential conflicts over norms between Child Theology and those rules and norms which are effective in practices that constitute R.E.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金