Polyglot reception of early christian apocryphal text in late antiquity and early middle ages: The Pseudoclementines

该项目涉及伪小柑橘的多语言接收。这是“欧罗巴多语”研究计划的一部分。Orte, Funktionen und Wirkungen der Mehrsprachigkeit in Spätantike und Mittelalter"并回到对提议者的长期研究。《伪克莱门汀》以自传的形式描述了罗马的克莱门特跟随使徒彼得进行传教之旅时所发生的事情。第一部基督教小说遵循克莱门特的传统和使徒的历史，以一种自由的方式描述了希腊人（异教徒），基督徒和犹太人之间的早期差异和对抗。所谓的“伪克莱门汀的基本著作”保存在两个不同的版本中。《讲道篇》是用希腊原文传播的。《承认》保存在阿奎莱亚的鲁菲努斯的拉丁文译本中。还有一个叙利亚文译本，包括《承认》和《讲道》的部分内容，以及两个更大的中世纪希腊文缩影。在较小的希腊语、阿拉伯语、格鲁吉亚语和亚美尼亚语的删节版本中，以及在《奇迹》和《克莱门提斯殉道者》和其他文本中，也可以看到多语言的接受。在过去，所谓的“伪克莱门派的基本著作”是根据《讲道》和《认识》重建的。自2000年以来，学者们开始研究《讲道篇》和《忏悔录》，在某种程度上，它们是克莱门特小说的独立版本。在此基础上，用“沃特费尔德方法”对基督教小说希腊文和拉丁文译本的一些基本概念及其语义场进行了分析。因此，问题的答案是，克莱门汀的传统是如何改变的，不仅被称为rekogniist和Homilist的编校者，而且还受到后来的翻译家，形而上学作家和新文本和附加文本编校者的影响。据推测，整个传统的内容在一定程度上保持稳定，但一些基本概念的改变不仅是偶然的，由于语言或其他未知的原因，而是有意改变，以适应文本，以便更好地接受地中海地区不同地区具有不同语言，文化，宗教和教会政治背景的读者群体。这些变化可能涉及他们集体身份的可能参考点，如希腊人，野蛮人的语义场的形成。他们从语言变化,达到了很长时间影响集体认同的形成,补充克莱门特的生活,在欧洲的一些地区有更多的突出和其他新开发的传统克莱门特,酥油和缩写和一些重要的历史基督教教条和教会历史和篡改和掺假,这可能支持东西方教会的分离。

The project deals with the polyglott reception of the Pseudoclementines. It is part of the research proposal "Europa polyglotta. Orte, Funktionen und Wirkungen der Mehrsprachigkeit in Spätantike und Mittelalter" and goes back to long-term research of the proposer. The Pseudoclementines describe in autobiographical form what happend to Clement of Rome, when he followed the apostel Peter on his missionary journeys. The first christian novel follows the tradition of Clement and the history of the apostles and describes in a free way the early differences and confrontations between Greeks (pagans), Christians and Jews. The so called ,basic writings' of the Pseudoclementines are preserved in two different redactions. The Homilies are transmitted in the Greek original. The Recognitions are preserved in a latin translation by Rufinus of Aquileia. There is also a Syriac translation, consisting of parts of the Recognitions and Homilies, and two larger Greek epitomes from the middle ages. The polyglott reception is also visible in smaller Greek, Arabic, Georgic and Armenian abrigded versions and likewise in the Miraculum and the Martyrium Clementis and in other texts. In the past the so called ,basic writings' of the Pseudoclementines were reconstructed from the Homilies and the Recognitions. Since 2000 scholars began to study the Homilies and the Recognitions as, in a way, independent versions of the novel of Clement. According to this new approach some basic concepts and their semantic fields of the Greek and Latin version of the christian novel are analysed with the 'Wortfeldmethode'. Thus the question is answered, how the tradition of the Clementines changed not only by the redactors known as Rekognitionist and Homilist, but also by the influence of later translators, metaphrastic writers and redactors of new and additional texts. It is supposed that the content of the whole string of tradition remained to a certain degree stable, but some basic concepts changed not only by chance, by linguistic or other unknown reasons, but were intentionally changed to adapt the text for a better reception by groups of readers with a different linguistic, cultural, religious and church-political background in the different parts of the Mediterrean area. These changes may concern possible points of reference of their collective identity like the formation of the semantic field for Hellenes, barbarians. They range from linguistic shifts, which had a long reaching impact on the formation of collective identity, to supplements of the life of Clement, in which some regions of Europe are given more prominence and others are newly exploited for the tradition of Clement, to shortenings and abridgements with some importance for the history of the christian dogma and ecclesiastical history and to interpolations and adulterations, which may have endorsed the separation of the church in east and west.