权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Crisis Corporatism or Corporatism in Crisis? Social Concertation and Social Pacts in Europe

危机中的社团主义还是危机中的社团主义？

基本信息

批准号：
289769799
负责人：
Privatdozent Dr. Thomas Bahle, since 1/2017
金额：
--
依托单位：
Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2016
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2015-12-31 至 2019-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/289769799?language=en
关键词：
Crisis Corporatism Social Concertation Pacts

项目摘要

Has the global financial and economic crisis contributed to a renaissance of corporatism or to its erosion? The focus of the project is the question whether national governments or transnational institutions utilize social concertation with employer associations and trade unions as part of negotiating economic and social policies (social pacts). The objective is the further development and examination of the corporatist approach, which investigates tripartite interest intermediation in the course of increased economic integration and welfare state reforms since the 1990s. The project examines whether tripartite interest intermediation has been undertaken as part of the recent crisis policy, and if not, why not. The project addresses three questions: (1) Under what conditions do governments seek social consultation and when are social pacts likely? (2) How do the political and social actors interact in these negotiation processes? (3) What role does the EU social dialogue play in the European and national crisis management? In a systematic comparison (fsQCA), the contextual conditions for social concertation for the decade before and since the crash of 2008 will be analyzed for all EU member states as well as Norway and Switzerland. In addition, in-depth case studies of eight countries (Germany and other selected European countries) and a study of the European Union examine the (trans-)national actor strategies and negotiation processes with the help of interviews and document analyses. The focal point of the process analyses is the immediate crisis politics and the subsequent austerity phase. In cooperation with international experts, the project develops a database with indicators on the contextual conditions in Europe and compiles an edited volume (in English) with country chapters, an EU study and comparative analyses. Thus, the project contributes to the public debate on whether the involvement of social partners during the height of the crisis and subsequent austerity period has slowed down or reversed a gradual erosion of social partnership.

全球金融和经济危机是促进了社团主义的复兴还是削弱了它？该项目的重点是国家政府或跨国机构是否利用与雇主协会和工会的社会协调作为经济和社会政策（社会契约）谈判的一部分。其目的是进一步发展和研究社团主义方法，该方法研究自20世纪90年代以来经济一体化和福利国家改革不断加强的过程中的三方利益中介。该项目审查了三方利益中介是否已作为最近危机政策的一部分进行，如果没有，为什么没有。该项目解决三个问题：（1）政府在什么条件下寻求社会协商，什么时候可能达成社会契约？(2)政治和社会行动者在这些谈判过程中如何互动？(3)欧盟社会对话在欧洲和国家危机管理中发挥什么作用？在一项系统性比较（fsQCA）中，将对所有欧盟成员国以及挪威和瑞士在2008年金融危机之前和之后的十年中社会协调的背景条件进行分析。此外，对八个国家（德国和其他选定的欧洲国家）的深入个案研究和对欧洲联盟的一项研究借助访谈和文件分析，审查了（跨）国家行为者的战略和谈判进程。过程分析的重点是眼前的危机政治和随后的紧缩阶段。该项目与国际专家合作，开发了一个数据库，其中载有关于欧洲背景条件的指标，并汇编了一本编辑过的书（英文），其中包括国家章节、一份欧盟研究报告和比较分析。因此，该项目有助于公众辩论社会合作伙伴在危机最严重时期和随后的紧缩时期的参与是否减缓或扭转了社会伙伴关系的逐步侵蚀。