Beyond Kiel. History of science of the quantitative theoretical turn in German speaking Geography from historical network perspective and uneven geographies.

从科学哲学和科学实践的角度来看，德国地理学史上所谓的量化革命是该学科的重大转折点之一。同时，德语地理学也没有对这一量化理论转向进行合理的史学分析。学科的故事，因为它是在一般概述，介绍性文献，新的理论概念，但也在非正式的叙述中只集中在几个单独的事件(1969年德国地理学家会议和Dietrich Bartels Convidiation&Gt；Zur Wisenschaftsoretischen Grundleung einer Gegraph des Menschen&lt；1968)。这种看待它的方式经不起精确的历史考察，并产生了一种对地理学学科的叙述，但这种叙述方式有问题地简化和理顺了。基于科学史上的新方法和英语地理学中关于这一阶段的项目，我们提出了一个研究项目，旨在将量化理论转向的故事讲述为一个比目前更复杂、不同和矛盾的过程。该项目计划展示的不仅仅是思想史的观点，而是将科学理解为一种社会的、具体化的、物质的和当地的实践。因此，本课题填补了当前学科史研究的空白，目前主要关注古典地理学和景观地理学，以及地理学与国家社会主义的关系。因此，我们提出了一种双重的研究方法：1)以历史网络分析的形式，对20世纪50年代至70年代的德语地理学进行系统而广泛的分析。历史网络研究作为一种描述人、机构和知识网络中的关系、位置和互动的探索性方法，提供了破坏事后制定和产生的中央行为者和事件/事件的动机的机会。2)基于我们正计划以地方和特定地点的视角显示，有许多地方的量化革命和量化革命产生了超越统一/主导的量化革命范式的独立和矛盾的理解。这种地方性的定量理论思维方式在地理学领域创造了比概念推理更多样化的实践。对量化理论转向的史学分析，在该学科的历史视角(充分理解理论和概念的历史性的必要性)的背景下，以及对最近的问题(关于新的量化转向和正在进行的关于大数据的类似讨论，根本不涉及历史辩论)的背景下，也是有意义的，因此是一个紧迫的问题。

From the perspective of the philosophy of science and scientific practices the so called >quantitative revolution< in the history of German geography, is one of the disciplines major turning points. At the same time there is not jet a sound historiographic analysis of this quantitative-theoretic turn in the German speaking Geography. The disciplines story as it is told in general overviews, introductory literature, new theoretical concepts but also in informal narratives only focuses on a few singular incidents (German conference of Geographers in 1969 und Dietrich Bartels habilitation >Zur wissenschaftstheoretischen Grundlegung einer Geographie des Menschen< 1968). This way of looking at it doesn´t stand up to an exact historical investigation und produces a narrative of the discipline of geography that is in a problematic way simplified and straightened.Based on new approaches in the history of science and projects concerning this phase in the Anglophone geography we propose a research project that aims to tell the Story of the quantitative theoretical turn as a more complex, heterogeneous and ambivalent process than it is up until now. The project plans to present more than a history of ideas perspective, but to understand science as a social, embodied, material und local practice. Hence the project fills a void in the current way of dealing with the disciplines history, at present it focuses mainly on the classical and landscape Geography and the relation between geography and National social-ism.Therefore we propose a double approach on the subject: 1) In the form of an historical network analysis, which analyses the German speaking geography of the 1950ies- 1970ies in a systematically and broad manner. The historical network research as an explorative method to describe relations, positions and interactions in networks of people, institutions and knowledge, provides the opportunity to destabilize the ex-post formulated und produced narra-tives of central actors and occurrences/incidents.2) Based on that we are planning to show with a local and location-specific perspective that there were a number of local >quantitative Revolutions< that produced independent and con-tradictory understandings beyond the unified/ dominant paradigm of the >quantitative Revolution<. This local ways of quantitative-theoretical thinking in the field of geography created a more diverse practice than shown in conceptual reasoning. A historiographic analysis of the quantitative-theoretic turn is also of interest in the context of an historical perspective on the discipline (in terms of the necessity of an adequate under-standing of the historicity of theories and concepts) as well as for recent problems (concerning similar discussions about a new quantitative turn and Big data being conducted without men-tioning the historical debate at all) and therefore a matter of urgency.