权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Beyond Kiel. History of science of the quantitative theoretical turn in German speaking Geography from historical network perspective and uneven geographies.

超越基尔。

基本信息

批准号：
332948674
负责人：
Professor Dr. Boris Michel
金额：
--
依托单位：
Professur für Digitale Geographie
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2016
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2015-12-31 至 2020-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/332948674?language=en
关键词：
Beyond Kiel.History science quantitative

项目摘要

From the perspective of the philosophy of science and scientific practices the so called >quantitative revolution< in the history of German geography, is one of the disciplines major turning points. At the same time there is not jet a sound historiographic analysis of this quantitative-theoretic turn in the German speaking Geography. The disciplines story as it is told in general overviews, introductory literature, new theoretical concepts but also in informal narratives only focuses on a few singular incidents (German conference of Geographers in 1969 und Dietrich Bartels habilitation >Zur wissenschaftstheoretischen Grundlegung einer Geographie des Menschen< 1968). This way of looking at it doesn´t stand up to an exact historical investigation und produces a narrative of the discipline of geography that is in a problematic way simplified and straightened.Based on new approaches in the history of science and projects concerning this phase in the Anglophone geography we propose a research project that aims to tell the Story of the quantitative theoretical turn as a more complex, heterogeneous and ambivalent process than it is up until now. The project plans to present more than a history of ideas perspective, but to understand science as a social, embodied, material und local practice. Hence the project fills a void in the current way of dealing with the disciplines history, at present it focuses mainly on the classical and landscape Geography and the relation between geography and National social-ism.Therefore we propose a double approach on the subject: 1) In the form of an historical network analysis, which analyses the German speaking geography of the 1950ies- 1970ies in a systematically and broad manner. The historical network research as an explorative method to describe relations, positions and interactions in networks of people, institutions and knowledge, provides the opportunity to destabilize the ex-post formulated und produced narra-tives of central actors and occurrences/incidents.2) Based on that we are planning to show with a local and location-specific perspective that there were a number of local >quantitative Revolutions< that produced independent and con-tradictory understandings beyond the unified/ dominant paradigm of the >quantitative Revolution<. This local ways of quantitative-theoretical thinking in the field of geography created a more diverse practice than shown in conceptual reasoning. A historiographic analysis of the quantitative-theoretic turn is also of interest in the context of an historical perspective on the discipline (in terms of the necessity of an adequate under-standing of the historicity of theories and concepts) as well as for recent problems (concerning similar discussions about a new quantitative turn and Big data being conducted without men-tioning the historical debate at all) and therefore a matter of urgency.

从科学哲学和科学实践的角度看，德国地理学史上的所谓“定量革命”，是该学科的重大转折点之一。同时，在德语地理学中，对这种数量理论转向的史学分析也不多见。学科的故事，因为它是在一般概述，介绍性文献，新的理论概念，但也在非正式的叙述只集中在少数几个单一的事件（德国地理学家会议在1969年和迪特里希巴特尔斯hurt>Zur wissenschaftstheoretischen Grundlegung einer Geographie des Menschen< 1968年）。这种看待它的方式不经得起一个确切的历史调查，并产生了一个地理学科的叙述，这是在一个有问题的方式简化和拉直。基于科学史上的新方法和项目有关这一阶段的英语地理学，我们提出了一个研究项目，旨在告诉定量理论转向的故事，作为一个更复杂的，它是一个多相的、矛盾的过程。该项目计划呈现的不仅仅是思想史的视角，而是将科学理解为一种社会的、具体的、物质的和地方的实践。因此，该项目填补了目前处理学科历史的方式的空白，目前它主要集中在古典地理学和景观地理学以及地理学与国家社会主义的关系上。因此，我们提出了一个双重的主题：1）以历史网络分析的形式，它以系统和广泛的方式分析了20世纪50年代至70年代的德语地理。历史网络研究作为一种探索性的方法来描述人、机构和知识网络中的关系、位置和相互作用，提供了一个机会，以动摇事后制定和生产的叙述，中央演员和事件/事件。2）基于此，我们计划显示与当地和特定位置的角度来看，有一些地方>数量革命<这产生了独立的和矛盾的理解，超越了统一/主导的范式>定量革命<。地理学领域的这种定量理论思维方式创造了比概念推理更多样化的实践。从历史学的角度看这门学科，对数量理论转向的历史学分析也是有意义的（就充分理解理论和概念的历史性的必要性而言）以及最近的问题（关于新的定量转向和大数据的类似讨论，而根本没有提到历史辩论），因此是一个紧迫问题。