The Venetian Army on Ottoman Soil 1684-1718. Translocalisation, Experience of War, Transculturation

1684-1718 年奥斯曼土地上的威尼斯军队。

• 批准号: 354276905
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Markus Koller
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Historisches Institut
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Priority Programmes
• 财政年份: 2017
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2016-12-31 至 2023-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/354276905?language=en
• 关键词: Venetian; Army; Ottoman; Soil; 1684

Aim of the project remains the investigation and representation of the war experience of the soldiers of the Venetian army in the Ottoman regions of Dalmatia, Albania and Greece, which they conquered, occupied and largely lost again in the two Morea Wars 1684-1699 and 1715-1718. As with other forms, military forms of mobility do not only represent a link between departure and end point. It also includes crossing spaces and the resulting processes of translocalization and transculturalization. The approach of analyzing military mobility as "transcultural entanglement" has proven fruitful and will therefore be pursued in the second phase of the project.The study will be carried out on two levels, which correspond to two different types of sources:On the one hand, there are life-writings from Venetian and recruited representatives of the military elite (from officer cadet upwards). These documents - so far neglected by research - have proven to be exceptional sources for a more in-depth analysis of military mobility and interdependencies. Individual examples show how the soldiers compared their ideas of the war against the Ottomans and the Ottoman Empire itself with the existing reality and how their patterns of interaction and cooperation with "colleagues" of their own and foreign armies and "locals" in conquered territories changed. Production and intercultural transfers of military experience and military knowledge within the ethnically and religiously heterogeneous Venetian army, as well as between the armies of the two hostile camps and with "third" European powers, will also be examined using this material.On the other hand, previously unknown files of the Venetian military administration of the conquered territories were localized in the first phase of the project. These sources by state authorities, to a certain extent replace missing life-writings from Venetian rank and file. The intention formulated for the first phase of the project, to capture as many aspects of the life of non-commissioned officers and ordinary soldiers as possible, should therefore be continued. This applies to everyday life, from recruiting to the way to the theater of war, garrison, camp and field service, billeting and other encounters with the civilian population (including women) and, in a nutshell, experiences, interpretations and processing of combat and violence, desertion and captivity, homecoming or illness, injury and death.

该项目的目的仍然是调查和展示威尼斯军队士兵在达尔马提亚、阿尔巴尼亚和希腊等奥斯曼帝国地区的战争经历，他们征服、占领这些地区，并在1684-1699年和1715-1718年的两次莫雷亚战争中再次失去大部分。与其他形式一样，军事形式的流动不仅代表出发和终点之间的联系。它还包括跨越空间以及由此产生的跨本土化和跨文化进程。将军事流动性分析为“跨文化纠缠”的方法已被证明是卓有成效的，因此将在项目的第二阶段进行。研究将在两个层面上进行，对应于两种不同类型的来源：一方面，有来自威尼斯人的生平著作和招募的军事精英代表(从军官学员以上)。这些迄今被研究忽视的文件已被证明是更深入分析军事机动性和相互依存性的特殊来源。个别例子表明，士兵们如何将他们对奥斯曼帝国和奥斯曼帝国本身的战争想法与现有现实进行比较，以及他们与本国和外国军队的“同事”以及被征服领土上的“当地人”的互动与合作模式如何改变。此外，还将使用该材料研究种族和宗教不同的威尼斯军队内部以及两个敌对阵营的军队之间以及与“第三”欧洲列强之间军事经验和军事知识的生产和跨文化转让。国家当局的这些来源，在一定程度上取代了威尼斯普通民众缺失的生平著作。因此，应继续执行为该项目第一阶段制定的意图，即尽可能多地了解士官和普通士兵生活的各个方面。这适用于日常生活，从征兵到前往战区、驻军、营地和外勤服务、布署和与平民(包括妇女)的其他接触，简而言之，也适用于战斗和暴力、逃兵和被俘、返乡或疾病、受伤和死亡的经历、解释和处理。