Undetermined baroque poetry. Poetic and confessional ambiguity in Silesia as cultural dynamic factors of a new German poetry (1620-1742)

这个项目以近代早期为背景。它转向了一个问题，是什么影响了西里西亚公国宗教政治的多样性和活力，对德国巴洛克诗歌的影响。在研究小组“Ambiguität und Unterscheidung: historischkulturelle Dynamiken”的系统背景下，诗歌和忏悔歧义的相互作用领域处于兴趣的中心。探索性的兴趣集中在西里西亚诗歌的主要代理人（除了奥皮茨，尤其是安德烈亚斯·格里菲乌斯、霍夫曼诉霍夫曼斯瓦尔道、丹尼尔·卡斯帕诉洛亨斯坦、约翰·克里斯蒂安·霍尔曼、本杰明·纽基希和克里斯蒂安·格里菲乌斯）。这些作者的文本输出包括各种不同类型的文学作品，其中包括抒情、戏剧和颂歌形式。与此密切相关的是巴洛克诗学。语篇语料库为详细展示如何讨论歧义的表达方式和语用目的以获得具有约束力的规范提供了基础。因此，模糊的空间和边缘及其在历史理解中的进展被勾画出来。考虑到这样一个事实，在这样一个不安的时代，诗歌和忏悔的模糊性之间的相互作用产生了西里西亚诗歌生产力的无与伦比的成功，这让人不禁要问，下一步，这如何能激发德语地区其他地区的诗歌运动。从文学史的更高角度来看，我们将仔细回顾(i)西里西亚诗歌改革作为一个坚定的新教文学项目的片面看法，（ii）宗教干预巴洛克诗歌作为忏悔论战的潜在决心，以及（iii）将宗派主义塑造为巩固宗教差异的过程的普遍描述。本项目的研究成果以两种形式记录，这两种形式相互建立：1。一个具有综合注释的词库形状的数据库使巴洛克时期诗学书籍中的所有类型的歧义都可以访问；这将对基础研究产生无与伦比的实质性贡献。2)。主要研究者将所有鉴定出来的文献整理成专著，按照科学问题进行分析呈现，并从文学史的角度进行评价。

The project is set in Early Modern times. It turns to the question what effects the very special diversity and dynamic of religious politics in the duchy of Silesia deployed on German baroque poetry. In the systematic context of the research group "Ambiguität und Unterscheidung: Historisch-kulturelle Dynamiken" the field of interaction of poetical and confessional ambiguity stands in the centre of interest. The exploratory interest focusses on the main agents of Silesian poetry (besides Opitz especially Andreas Gryphius, Hoffmann v. Hoffmannswaldau, Daniel Caspar v. Lohenstein, Johann Christian Hallmann, Benjamin Neukirch und Christian Gryphius). The textual output of these authors comprises a wide range of different sorts of literature which incorporates lyric, dramatic and panegyric forms. Closely tied to this is baroque poetics. The text corpus provides the fundament to display in detail how means of expression and pragmatic aims of ambiguity are discussed in order to get a binding norm. As a result, the spaces and margins of ambiguity and their progression in a historic understanding are contoured.Given the fact that the interplay between poetic and confessional ambiguity provoked by such uneasy times generated the incomparable success of Silesian poetic productivity makes one ask in the next step how this could spark other regional poetic movements on German speaking territories. From the higher perspective of literary history there will be a close review of (i) the one-sided perception of the Silesian poetic reform as a decidedly protestant literary programme, (ii) the latent determination of religiously intervening Baroque poetry as confessional polemics as well as (iii) the prevailing description of sectarianism being moulded as a process of consolidating religious differences.The research results of this project are documented by two forms which build on one another: 1.) A data base in the shape of a thesaurus with comprehensive comments makes accessible all types of ambiguity in books on poetics in Baroque times; this will produce an unrivalled, substantial contribution to fundamental research. 2.) The principal investigator compiles all documents identified into a monograph, presenting it analytically according to the scientific problem and evaluates it from the perspective of literary history.