Undetermined baroque poetry. Poetic and confessional ambiguity in Silesia as cultural dynamic factors of a new German poetry (1620-1742)

未确定的巴洛克诗歌。

• 批准号: 411076289
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Jörg Wesche
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Seminar für Deutsche Philologie
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Units
• 财政年份: 2018
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2017-12-31 至 2021-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/411076289?language=en
• 关键词: Undetermined; baroque; poetry.; Poetic; confessional

The project is set in Early Modern times. It turns to the question what effects the very special diversity and dynamic of religious politics in the duchy of Silesia deployed on German baroque poetry. In the systematic context of the research group "Ambiguität und Unterscheidung: Historisch-kulturelle Dynamiken" the field of interaction of poetical and confessional ambiguity stands in the centre of interest. The exploratory interest focusses on the main agents of Silesian poetry (besides Opitz especially Andreas Gryphius, Hoffmann v. Hoffmannswaldau, Daniel Caspar v. Lohenstein, Johann Christian Hallmann, Benjamin Neukirch und Christian Gryphius). The textual output of these authors comprises a wide range of different sorts of literature which incorporates lyric, dramatic and panegyric forms. Closely tied to this is baroque poetics. The text corpus provides the fundament to display in detail how means of expression and pragmatic aims of ambiguity are discussed in order to get a binding norm. As a result, the spaces and margins of ambiguity and their progression in a historic understanding are contoured.Given the fact that the interplay between poetic and confessional ambiguity provoked by such uneasy times generated the incomparable success of Silesian poetic productivity makes one ask in the next step how this could spark other regional poetic movements on German speaking territories. From the higher perspective of literary history there will be a close review of (i) the one-sided perception of the Silesian poetic reform as a decidedly protestant literary programme, (ii) the latent determination of religiously intervening Baroque poetry as confessional polemics as well as (iii) the prevailing description of sectarianism being moulded as a process of consolidating religious differences.The research results of this project are documented by two forms which build on one another: 1.) A data base in the shape of a thesaurus with comprehensive comments makes accessible all types of ambiguity in books on poetics in Baroque times; this will produce an unrivalled, substantial contribution to fundamental research. 2.) The principal investigator compiles all documents identified into a monograph, presenting it analytically according to the scientific problem and evaluates it from the perspective of literary history.

这部作品的背景设定在早期的现代。它转向这样一个问题：西里西亚公爵领地非常特殊的宗教政治的多样性和活力对德国巴洛克诗歌有什么影响？在“歧义与不确定”研究小组的系统背景下，诗意歧义和忏悔歧义相互作用的领域是人们感兴趣的中心。探索性的兴趣集中在西里西亚诗歌的主要代理人(除了奥普茨，特别是安德烈亚斯·格里菲斯，霍夫曼诉霍夫曼斯瓦尔道，丹尼尔·卡斯帕诉洛亨斯坦，约翰·克里斯蒂安·哈尔曼，本杰明·诺基奇和克里斯蒂安·格里菲斯)。这些作家的文本输出包括广泛的不同种类的文学，其中包括抒情、戏剧和颂歌形式。与此密切相关的是巴洛克诗学。语料库提供了详细展示歧义的表达方式和语用目的的基础，以获得具有约束力的规范。因此，模糊的空间和边缘以及它们在历史理解中的进展是有争议的。鉴于这样一个事实，即由这种不安时代引发的诗歌和忏悔模糊之间的相互作用产生了西里西亚诗歌生产力的无与伦比的成功，这让人在下一步如何在德语地区引发其他地区的诗歌运动。从文学史的更高角度来看，将仔细审查(I)片面地将西里西亚诗歌改革视为明确的新教文学纲领，(Ii)将宗教介入巴洛克诗歌作为忏悔性论战的潜在决心，以及(Iii)将宗派主义普遍描述为巩固宗教分歧的过程。本项目的研究结果通过两种相互建立的形式得到记录。具有全面注释的词库形式的数据库使巴洛克时代关于诗学的书籍中的所有类型的歧义都可以获取；这将对基础研究产生无与伦比的实质性贡献。2.)首席调查者将所有确定的文献汇编成一本专著，根据科学问题进行分析，并从文学史的角度对其进行评估。