Study on the Land Use Control through the Land Consolidation Procedure

通过土地整理程序控制土地用途的研究

• 批准号: 05660263
• 负责人: HIROTA Junichi
• 金额: $ 1.22万
• 依托单位: IWATE UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1993
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1993 至 1994
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-05660263/
• 关键词: Land Consolidation; Land use control; Compensation; Public interests; 土地利用調整

This Study has two subjects. The first is on the cotribution of lands for public interests like as roads, river, park and so on, and the second is on the cost allocation by the land owners of giving or taking lands for non-agricultural purposes. The results are as follows ;First subject : (1) Recently in many Land Consolidation projects, lands are contributed for public interests by the all the participants relative to the value of their old parcels. This is a very usuful way for both public sectors and participants (land owners). (2) But there is not so well legally systemized in the Land Consolidation procedure that causes difficulties to contribute lands for public facilities in realities. (3) The first difficulty is that it is impossible to transfer the land ownership to public sectors before superseding the new legal status which is completed at the end of the project. The public sectors don't want to take lands and pay for them without their ownership. (4) The second is that land … More owners must pay more tax for giving lands in the Land Consolidation procedure than in the case of selling for public purposes in ordinary procedure. It is because the tax system does'nt prepare enough deduction for the Land Consolidation procedure. (5) There are, therefore, often found illegal reactions to solve the above situation. (6) I propose the introduction of a special procedure for contributing lands for public interests, and of an agreement between public sectors and the Land Consolidation sector for transference of land ownership.Second subject : (1) The present Land Consolidation act does'nt give qualification of participants to the land owners of giving or taking lands of non-agricultural purposes in the projects, therefore they have no obligation to pay the expense of the projects. (2) But they actually get profits through the projects, that is, improving roads and drainage condition, taking better parcels for non-agricultural use (good position, land consolidation, well shaped lots etc.) , saving the costs of measurement and register, and deregulation. (3) Then, the participants of paying the project expenses have the feeling of unequality, and so that there are some project areas that allocate the expenses to the land owners on non-agricultural use. (4) The allocation is reasonable and probable, because we can specify the person of getting profits and the contents of profits. (5) I propose that the act should be revised to ask the cost allocation to the land owners related to non-agricultural use. For it, there will be a legal problem left in the qualification of participants. Less

这项研究有两个主题。第一部分是关于道路、河流、公园等公共利益用地的成本问题，第二部分是关于土地所有者对非农用地出让或征用的成本分摊问题。研究结果如下：（1）近年来，在许多土地整理项目中，土地是由所有参与者相对于其旧地块的价值为公共利益而贡献的。对于公共部门和参与者（土地所有者）来说，这是一种非常常用的方式。(2)但由于土地整理程序缺乏法律制度化，导致现实中公共设施用地难以划拨。(3)第一个困难是，在项目结束时完成的新的法律的地位被取代之前，不可能将土地所有权转让给公共部门。公共部门不想在没有所有权的情况下征用土地并为此付费。(4)第二个是土地 ...更多信息 业主在土地合并程序中出让土地时必须缴纳的税款比在普通程序中出售土地用于公共用途时要多。这是因为税收制度没有为土地整理程序准备足够的扣除。(5)因此，经常发现非法反应来解决上述情况。(6)我建议为公共利益提供土地的特别程序，以及公共部门和土地整理部门之间的土地所有权转让协议。第二个主题：（1）现行土地整理法没有赋予土地所有者在项目中出让或征用非农业用地的参与者资格，因此，他们没有义务支付项目的费用。(2)但他们实际上是通过项目获得利润的，即改善道路和排水条件，将更好的地块用于非农业用途（好位置，土地整理，形状良好的地块等）。节约计量和登记成本，放松管制。(3)那么，项目费用的支付者就有了不平等的感觉，从而出现了一些项目区将费用分摊给土地所有者用于非农用途的现象。(4)这种分配是合理的、可能的，因为我们可以明确利润的获得者和利润的内容。(5)我建议修改该法案，要求将与非农业用途有关的成本分摊给土地所有者。对它来说，在参与者的资格方面将留下一个法律的问题。少