Research about the structure of Aristotle's Political Philosophy

关于这一研究项目，我写了以下4篇文章，我已经在参考文献中详细列出了这4篇文章。《亚里士多德的奴隶制》、《亚里士多德的政治学》中的公民和宪法概念、《当代政治哲学中的基本观点》、《亚里士多德的政治学中的中间宪法》。在第一篇文章中，我指出了亚里士多德关于奴隶的概念中潜藏的不连贯之处。也就是说，他将奴隶定义为缺乏理性的生活工具，而他又不得不承认奴隶是定义为理性的人。这一点可以是一个哲学基础，它能够打破奴隶制，建立全人类的平等。在第二篇文章中，我阐明了亚里士多德《政治学》中的公民和宪法的概念。也就是说，他把公民定义为能够从事政治活动的人。这一定义可以打破传统的包含种族、性别、社会阶层、家谱歧视的公民概念，使他的定义成为民主的基础。在第三篇文章中，我承认多元文化状况是当代世界不可逆转的预设，必须成为政治哲学的基础。也就是说，它必须寻找一种能够让不同的邪教和宗教共存的正义概念。这就是自由和平等的概念。在第四篇文章中，我明确指出，民主的理念与亚里士多德的戈伦平均主义有着密切的联系。也就是说，最好的宪法是在美德和财富方面都以中产阶级为主体的宪法。稳定来自中间，这正是民主的卓越之处。这是三年来的研究成果。

Concerning to this research project, I wrote, as I have listed in References in detail, the following 4 articles. 'Slavery in Aristotle', 'Concept of Citizen and Constitution in Aristotle's "Politics"', 'Fundamental Viewpoints in Contemporary Political Philosophies', 'The Middle Constitution in Aristotle's "Politics"'. In the first article, I indicated an incoherency which lurked in Aristotle's conception of a slave. Namely, he defined a slave as a living tool which lacks reason, while he cannot help recognize a slave as an human being that is rational being in definition. This point can be a philosophical basis which is able to explode slavery and to establish equality of all human being. In the second article, I clarified the concept of citizen and constitution in Aristotle's "Politics". That is to say, he defined a citizen as a person capable of political activities. This definition can demolish the traditional concept of citizen which consists of a discrimination of race, gender, social class, genealogy, so that his definition can be a basis of democracy. In the third article, I recognized multicultural condition as an unreversible presupposition of contemporary world which must be basis of political philosophies. Namely, it must search a concept of justice that is able to let different cultres and religions to coexist. This concept is just that of freedom and equality. In the fourth article, I made clear that the idea of democracy has a close conexion with the idea of the aristotelian golen mean. Namely, the best constitution is that in which the maiority is the middle class in virtue as well as in wealth. The stability comes from the middle that is just the exellency of democracy. These are the results of the three years research.