权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A STUDY ON THE DYNAMIC RELATIONSHIPS OF DECISION MAKING STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING IN GOVERNMENTAL PLANNING

政府规划中决策结构与组织学习的动态关系研究

基本信息

批准号：
11420013
负责人：
MORITA Akira
金额：
$ 7.04万
依托单位：
The University of Tokyo
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
1999
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1999 至 2001
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

Our analysis of the first data sets on local governments shows that the agenda setting process is influenced by the organizational structure. As the power is shared equally among the participants in the organization, the agenda of administrative reform, environmental policy, and urban planning has high priorities. In contrast, the issues of welfare and education policy are on the agenda, as the organization has the concentrated power structure.We have four types of policy process in the local governments according to the informational source of issues. These policy making processes have different polity tools and coordination costs.Our analysis of the second data sets on public finance in local governments shows that they have different perceptions of the causes and effects of financial crisis. They are influenced by the economic position in the markets and by the power structure of organizations. First, as the economic position of the local government is weak, it attributes its cause to the mal-functioned mechanism of financial coordination, and it sets high priority on the reform of redistributive mechanism. Contrarily, it emphasizes the reform of local tax system, as it has strong position in the economic market. Second, as the power is shared equally in the organization, it seeks the reform of financial coordination system. In contrast, it sets high priority on the reform of local tax system, as the power is concentrated on the mayor of local governments.

我们对第一批地方政府数据集的分析表明，议程设置过程受到组织结构的影响。由于权力在组织的参与者之间平均分配，行政改革、环境政策和城市规划的议程具有高度优先性。而福利政策和教育政策问题则因权力结构的集中而被提上议事日程，根据问题的信息来源，我们将地方政府的政策过程分为四种类型。这些政策制定过程具有不同的政治工具和协调成本，我们对第二批地方政府公共财政数据的分析表明，它们对金融危机的原因和影响有不同的看法。它们受到市场经济地位和组织权力结构的影响。首先，地方政府经济地位的弱势，将其原因归结为财政协调机制的失灵，并将再分配机制的改革作为重中之重。其次，由于地方税在市场经济中的强势地位，强调地方税体系的改革。二是在机构分权的基础上，寻求金融协调体制的改革。与此相反，它高度重视地方税收制度的改革，因为权力集中在地方政府的市长身上。