University Judgments. Evaluating Students’ Performances in Engineering and History.

大学判断。

• 批准号: 459030538
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Herbert Kalthoff
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Institut für Soziologie
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 资助国家: 德国
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/459030538?language=en
• 关键词: University; Judgments.; Evaluating; Students; Performances

Universities, as organizations of the formal system of education, are focal points through which significant parts of adolescents, after completing secondary education, receive further training. In teaching their temporary members - students - specific stocks of knowledge, they rehearse specific disciplinary views, which are refined in seminars, expeditions, laboratory studies, and practical training. Those courses and stations within academic degrees stand for specific institutional categorizations of students through academic staff members. Thereby, professors or junior researchers do not only observe students’ methodical or linguistic capabilities of professional knowledge, but also how this knowledge is appraised and considered by students. The project departs by studying a complex and intermingled process of teaching, examining and evaluating and by highlighting the categorization and marking of students. In a contrastive design, it focusses empirically on judgement in history and engineering by enquiring analytically into the social, material and symbolic dimensions of teaching and evaluation in higher education. The research project apprehends these proceedings as specific forms of non-school evaluation, which both defuse and intensify evaluation as employed in schools.

大学作为正规教育系统的组织，是很大一部分青少年在完成中等教育后接受进一步培训的中心。在教授他们的临时成员--学生--特定的知识储备时，他们排练特定的学科观点，这些观点在研讨会、考察、实验室研究和实践训练中得到完善。这些课程和站在学术学位代表特定的机构分类的学生通过学术人员。因此，教授或初级研究人员不仅要观察学生对专业知识的方法或语言能力，而且还要观察学生如何评价和考虑这些知识。该项目首先研究了教学、考试和评价的复杂和相互交织的过程，并强调了对学生的分类和评分。在一个对比设计，它侧重于经验上的判断，在历史和工程通过询问分析到社会，物质和象征性的层面，在高等教育的教学和评估。本研究项目将这些程序视为非学校评价的具体形式，它们既缓和了学校评价，又加强了学校评价。