Non-school evaluation. Universities and free schools between the requirement of differentiation and institutionalized contrasts

学校作为一个机构，对个人实行一项待遇计划，将他们分为好/坏、有才能/无才能、勤奋/懒惰，并在证书中承认这一点。作为一个特殊的机构，学校一直面临着其他形式的评价。该研究项目调查了两种机构，这两种机构根据与普通学校不同的原则和假设来进行人的区分：另一种是另类自由学校，另一种是大学。这些机构以不同的教育、学习和独立理论运作；在这样做的过程中，他们质疑教育成就的概念，并强调其局限性。在他们不同的概念和实践的背景下，两所大学都强调支持和挑战个人的经典教育理想。该研究项目旨在对另类免费学校和大学如何对个人进行待遇和评分进行实证调查，参与者如何协商这种待遇和评分以及他们如何采用这种待遇和评分。根据实证研究结果，该研究项目进一步旨在构建第一阶段资助的实证结果，即普通学校中人类的差异。

School as an institution administers a treatment program to individuals that marks them as good/bad, talented/untalented, studious/lazy and acknowledges this in certificates. As such a special institution school has always been faced with other forms of evaluation. The research project investigates two institutions that carry out the differentiation of humans on the basis of principles and assumptions different from those employed by regular schools: alternative free schools on the one hand and universities on the other hand. These institutions operate with different theories on education, learning and independence; in doing so they question the notion of educational achievement and highlight its limitation. Within the context of their differentiation concept and practice both institutions emphasise classic educational ideals of supporting and challenging individuals. The research project aims at an empirical investigation on how alternative free schools and universities conduct the treatment and marking of individuals, how this treatment and marking is negotiated among participants and how it is adopted by them. With the empirical findings the research project further aims at framing the empirical results of the first phase of funding, i.e., the differentiation of humans in regular schools.