A Research for the civil litigation through "Experimental circuit court"

1我们有2个“实验法庭”的模拟游戏。在这一活动中，许多法学家（律师、法官、教授）和司法代理人根据自己的想法就民事诉讼进行了互动。通过两次模拟，解决了谈判过程中的许多问题。我们通过口头或电子邮件的方式在网上进行了讨论，并发表了2篇讨论报告和2篇日语词汇模拟报告，以及一篇埃格利什和日语的总结报告。通过研究，我们可以得出以下结论：1.研究的目的是为了提高研究的质量。(1)在法庭上，当事人多说话比律师代表当事人多说话更重要，但当事人多说话又因对未来的焦虑而很难做到，因此我们必须开始思考法庭上的基本态度和氛围，如“如何相互说话”。(2)在妥协中，当法官试图逐一面谈时，增加了双方当事人特别是双方当事人的焦虑，但只有使用司法语言的律师之间才有必要进行谈判。(3)反思这些本质，我们可以发现，我们应该澄清实践中背离理想理论的制度，讨论“法律的职业间虚拟协议”的必要性和局限性。

1 We had 2 simulation games of "experimental court". In which many jurists (lawyer, judge, professor) and judicial scriveners made interactions according to their own thought aout a civil litigation. Trough the 2 simulations, many problems about a process of negotiations were closed up. We discussed about them by oral or by E-mail on internet, and we published 2 reports of our discussion and the simunlation by Japanese words and a summary report by both of Eglish and Japanese. And also we have published them by Web on internet.2 Through the research we can conclude as following.(1) In the court, it is very important for the principals to speak more rather than a lawyer who represents principals, but it is also very difficult for them to do because of the anxiety for the future.So we must start to think about the fundamental attitude and atmosphere in the court like as "how to speak each other".(2) In the compromise, when the judge attempts to interview one-by-one, it increases the anxiety of both parties, especially that of both principals, but it is necessary to negotiate between only lawyers using judicial languages.(3) Thinking all of those essences, we will get findings that we should make clear the system of practice betraying the ideal theories, and we should discuss about the necessity and an limitation of an "virtual agreement between legal professions".