权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Research for the education of conflict resolution by useing the personal conputer game.

利用个人电脑游戏进行冲突解决教育的研究。

基本信息

批准号：
05802006
负责人：
MIZUTANI Tohru
金额：
$ 1.15万
依托单位：
Niigata University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1993
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1993 至 1994
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

(1) By operating of an program utility tool which is named "Authourware Professional", I try to construct an interaction program of a conflict resolution. Most conflict resolution theories has assumptions that there is a normative procedure, conclusion, and interaction, ---in most case, such is supose to be just one ---.However, in my interaction program, I would like to make clear, on the contrary to these theories, the point is a processing of interactions itself, where we have to take care about which and what action is better as a response to opposite action.(2) For this puorpose, I will make clear so called "prisoners game", which is understood as the basic model of all conflict simulation games is not so. Rather, by simulating on a personal conputer, I make the new program "tri-optional interaction game" as basic theoritical program.(3) Then, the new basic model will be aplied to following disputes. 1.Partition of estate. 2.How to commit afraud. 3.Collection of credit. 4.Exchange of immovables.(4) As an optional actions of such games, I include "an discommunication", a phone call, a letter sending, a using of certified mail, an advocate, an arbitration, a lawsuit, a provisional attachment, a provisional disposition, an "yakuza", and a suicide.(5) On the exchanging process of these interantions, in which process time and cost account is included, of couse, the computer as a opponent suppose to behave at randam in a case, or strategic in a case. Thinking all of those essences, we will get findngs that we do not make an action for a larger "pie", aco-understanding, nor cosuicide, rather we do such an action because of another calculation or management in our inner interactions.

(1)通过一个名为Authourware Professional的程序实用工具的操作，我试图构建一个冲突解决的交互程序。大多数冲突解决理论都假设有一个规范的程序，结论和互动，-在大多数情况下，这是假设只有一个-然而，在我的互动程序中，我想澄清的是，与这些理论相反，重点是互动本身的处理，在那里我们必须关心哪个和什么行动是更好的反应相反的行动。(2)为了这个目的，我将明确所谓的“囚徒博弈”，这是理解为所有的冲突模拟游戏的基本模型是不是这样的。通过在个人计算机上的模拟，将新程序“三选一互动游戏”作为基本的理论程序。(3)然后，将新的基本模式应用于后续的纠纷处理。1.财产分割。2.如何实施暴力。3.信用的收集。4.交换免疫力。(4)作为这种游戏的一个可选动作，我包括“切断联系”，打电话，写信，使用挂号信，辩护，仲裁，诉讼，临时扣押，临时处置，“黑帮”和自杀。(5)在这些交互的交换过程中，考虑到处理时间和费用的因素，计算机作为对手，在某种情况下是随机的，在某种情况下是策略的。思考所有这些本质，我们会发现，我们并不是为了一个更大的“馅饼”而采取行动，也不是为了相互理解，也不是为了自杀，而是因为我们内在互动中的另一种计算或管理。