权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Nature of IPE from a Viewpoint of Economics and Scenarios of World Order in the Post-Cold War Era

从经济视角和冷战后世界秩序情景看IPE的本质

基本信息

批准号：
07630037
负责人：
SAKAI Akio
金额：
$ 0.96万
依托单位：
KYOTO UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1995
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1995 至 1997
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

1. With a break down of US-USSR bipolar structure, coinciding with the end of the Cold War, new world order in the post-Cold War era became a matter of concern all over the world, and various scenarios (Pax Americana II, bigemony, Pax Nipponica, Pax Consortis, etc.) were taken up for discussion. So this study has examined their relations and possibilities of coming true.2. With the intention of clarifying a real image of world order after the Cold War, this study has investigated the actual conditions of reorganization of collective security and international economic order. Consequently a steady progress of Pax Americana II,characterized by burden sharing of international public goods, could be clearly recognized.3.Arguments over the post-Cold War order has been closely connected with the trend of international political economy (IPE) . Focusing on two major theories in IPE, hegemonic stability theory (HST) and international interdependence theory (IIT) , this study has inquired into their characteristic features and controversial points. In this connection, fundamental differences between HST and IIT has sprung from different manner of grasp about several essential changes in international political structure, especially increasing weight of economic factors.4. IIT was born as an antith esis of HST characterized by state-centric approach to international politics, because it originally attached importance to some transnational relations. However, along with focusing on the regimes IIT has changed in quality and become a state-centric theory itself. For that reason there appeared a possibility of two theories' coexistence and cooperation. In fact HST and IIT has been combined each other mainly in a field of international public goods, and used in concert for the sake of justifying all sorts of international burden sharings.

1.随着美苏两极格局的瓦解和冷战的结束，后冷战时代的世界新秩序成为全世界关注的问题，出现了各种各样的可能性（第二代美国治下的和平、一国两制、日本治下的和平、财团治下的和平等）。进行了讨论。因此，本研究探讨了它们之间的关系和实现的可能性.本研究以澄清冷战后世界秩序的真实的图景为目的，考察了集体安全和国际经济秩序重组的现实状况。因此，以国际公共物品分担为主要特征的第二代美国治下的和平（Pax Americana II）正在稳步推进。3.冷战后国际秩序的争论与国际政治经济学的发展趋势密切相关。本文以国际政治经济学中的两大理论--霸权稳定理论和国际相互依存理论为研究对象，探讨了这两大理论的特点和争议点。在这方面，HST和IIT的根本区别源于对国际政治结构中几个重要变化的不同把握，特别是经济因素权重的增加。IIT的诞生是对以国家为中心的国际政治观为特征的HST的反对，因为它最初重视的是一些跨国关系。然而，沿着对制度的关注，产业内贸易理论已经发生了质的变化，成为一种以国家为中心的理论。这就出现了两种理论共存与合作的可能性。事实上，HST和IIT主要是在国际公共产品领域相互结合，并为各种国际负担分担提供合理性。