The Origins of Shojo in Ancient Japan

因此，古文字学在日本古代史研究者中是一个很少涉足的领域。只有在第二次世界大战后，历史学家才开始探索官方文件，如koseki（koseki）或keicho（keicho）; shosoinmonjo（shosoinmonjo）中的文件。这种学术工作仅限于研究根据政府当局之间交换的kushikiryo（kushikiryo）撰写的官方文件。目前仍有大量的非正式文献或称“庄”（shojo）需要加以分析，本研究试图追溯日本庄的起源。首先，本文以各种形式的手札为研究对象，特别是以赋（赋）的形式为研究对象，对《手札》中的手札按其写作风格和内容进行分类，以寻找手札形式、内容和写作风格之间的联系，并对手札的标题、结尾、年代、内容和形式进行了分析，指出了手札中的内容和形式之间的关系，并对手札中的内容进行了分析，指出了手札中的内容和形式之间的关系，指出了手札中的内容（agedokoro）或atedokoro（atedokoro）和wakidsuke（wakidsuke），人们可以注意到大多数的shojo遵循中国模式。然而，一些风格的wakidsuke和术语，以解决atedokoro是日本特有的。对《手札》的分析告诉我们，尽管大多数手札都是以其原始的“kei”或“jo”风格书写的，但也有一些使用了“kushikiryo”下的官方形式，如“ge”和“cho”。请注意，在《kushikiryo》中，ge和cho的用法并不像《kushikiryo》中那样，但它们带有一些具有烧酒特征的用法，如agedokoro、atedokoro和wakidsuke。通过对烧酒内容的分类，我们发现其中许多与zotodaijishishakyojo（zotodaijishishakyojo）有关。在第八世纪，在“Man-yoshu”（Man-yoshu）中有仅仅是个人的shojo。然而，一些shosoinmonjo的shojo是官方的。并不是所有的官方文件都是根据草书来写的：一些格和町使用了最初在幕府中使用的赋。

Heretofore, paleography has been a field scarcely undertaken among historians of Ancient Japanese history. Only after World War II have historians started to explore official documents such as the koseki (koseki) or the keicho (keicho) ; documents in the shosoinmonjo (shosoinmonjo). This academical work is limited to the study of official documents written according to the kushikiryo (kushikiryo), exchanged between government authorities. There is still a large amount of unofficial documents or shojo (shojo) that need to be analized.This study seeks to trace the origins of shojo in Japan. First it focuses in the different forms of shojo, expecially in the way of fu (fu) and categorizes the shojo in shosoinmonjo according to their writing style and content in order to find a connection between the forms of shojo, their contents and their writing styles.In examining the heading patterns, ending patterns, dating patterns, agedokoro (agedokoro) or atedokoro (atedokoro) and wakidsuke (wakidsuke), one can notice that most of the shojo follow the Chinese patterns. However, some of the styles of wakidsuke and the terms to address the atedokoro are peculiar to Japan. An analysis of the shojo tells us that although most of the shojo are written in their original kei (kei) or jo (jo) style, someuse official forms under the kushikiryo, such as ge (ge) and cho (cho). Notice that ge and cho were not used as stated in the kushikiryo, but they carried features characteristic of the shojo, such as agedokoro, atedokoro and wakidsuke.By classifying the shojo in terms of their contents, we find that manyof them were related to the zotodaijishishakyojo (zotodaijishishakyojo). In the eighth century, there were shojo in "Man-yoshu" (Man-yoshu) that were merely personal. Yet, some shojo in shosoinmonjo were official. Not all the official documents were written according to the kushikiryo : some ge and cho used fu which was originally used in shojo.