权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

International Comparative Study on Cartel Crime

卡特尔犯罪的国际比较研究

基本信息

批准号：
09620053
负责人：
SAINO Hikoya
金额：
$ 1.79万
依托单位：
HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1997
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1997 至 1999
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

My research is aiming at substantial improvement of criminal regulatory power for less competitive conducts in Japan. For this purpose, I studied on criminal regulations of developed countries including the US, France, Italy and Germany.In the first year of this project, I found out the fact that the provisions of collusion crime in France and Italy were taking after the Sherman Act of the US before WWII. The provision of collusive conduct at #96-3 of the Criminal Statute which was amended in 1941 were under the influence of Italian and French law. This history shows that Japan had already before WWII the primitive provision of cartel crime. As the result, I concluded that #96-3 of Criminal Statute is a special regulation to the present provision of #89 of Anti-trust Law concerning to punishment of cartel conduct in general.In the second year, I surveyed the 'effect theory' of the US, and the capability of introducing this theory in Japanese regal system and conclude that in extra-territorial cases this theory is not only applicable but also versatile also in Japan.In the last third year, I continued to study extra-territorial cases, particularly e-commerce area including digital signature. I made some suggestions on the new regulations of digital signature to Japanese Government. I was also interested in the theoretical aspect of relationship between intellectual right and anti-trust policy which is topically shown in Microsoft Inc. case

我的研究旨在大幅提高日本对低竞争行为的刑事监管能力。为此，我研究了美国、法国、意大利、德国等发达国家的刑事法规，在本项目的第一年，我发现法国和意大利的共谋罪规定是在二战前美国的《谢尔曼法案》之后制定的。1941年修订的《刑法》第96 -3条关于串通行为的规定受到意大利和法国法律的影响。这段历史表明，日本在二战前就已经有了卡特尔犯罪的原始规定。第二年，笔者考察了美国的“效果论”，并对美国的“效果论”进行了分析，认为美国的“效果论”是对我国现行的《反垄断法》第89条规定的一种特殊的规制。以及在日本王权制度中引入这一理论的可能性，并得出结论，在过去的第三年里，我继续研究域外案件，特别是包括数字签名在内的电子商务领域。对日本政府关于数字签名的新规定提出了一些建议。我对知识产权与反垄断政策之间关系的理论方面也很感兴趣，这一点在微软公司的案例中得到了很好的体现。情况