课题基金 / 基金详情

Country Planning for Rural Tourism Development in EU -Case Studies on Socially Different Background Countries in EU,Italy, Germany and France-

Country Planning for Rural Tourism Development in EU -Case Studies on Socially Different Background Countries in EU,Italy, Germany and France-
欧盟乡村旅游发展国别规划 -欧盟、意大利、德国、法国社会背景不同国家案例研究-
批准号:
08041071
负责人:
MUNETA Yoshifumi
金额:
$3.71万
依托单位国家:
日本
项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for international Scientific Research
财政年份:
1996
资助国家:
日本
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
1996 至 --

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
在最近公布的《1997年欧盟旅游业发展行动计划》中,农村旅游业被列为与区域和领土政策密切相关的一神论旅游业政策的中心问题,这些政策承认环境和农业问题在欧盟国家的重要性。为了促进农村地区的旅游业成为新型旅游目的地,地方政府在对该地区的自然环境和农业资源进行适当精简的情况下,在条例中详细规定了土地使用管制和设施准则。规划控制条例不仅要详细,而且要完成更多的生态和文化关注的新技术,以及在当地居民支持下应用参与式方法管理资源的新系统。本研究发现以下问题:1。乡村旅游发展规划条例的范围已经明确, 关于我们 艾德作为资源管理(景观、自然环境等)但不是为了促进农业发展。农业部门的经济影响在乡村旅游区不占主导地位,但新的旅游活动的丰富性增加了更普遍的影响,如人口趋势和当地文化的振兴。资源管理的规划规则得到了适当的设施指南和当地好客的独特理念(软件)的支持。在农村地区的各种游客的热情好客已经由当地居民,特别是在中年和年轻人,认识到他们的资源的价值。3.由于规划中的法律的结构,所研究的三个国家的规划工具(土地利用、景观、设施、建筑设计)不同。考虑到与日本法律的制度的其他差异,欧洲的资源管理规划工具和地方的乡村旅游理念可以引入日本乡村地区。因此,资源管理势在必行,即使在日本,规划控制区也应该覆盖所有的市辖区。乡村旅游需要新的资源发现,并有助于健康的区域发展与迷人的领土,召回农村地区的人口。日本地方政府应认识到欧洲经验作为其领土新政策的重要性,这可以通过跨越行政边界和部门划分以及通过地区行政级别(如县)的主动性来实现。少
英文摘要
Rural Tourism has been notified as a central issue of the Unitarian Tourism Policy, closely related to the regional and territorial policies, which recognize the importance of environmental and agrarian matters in EU countries, in the recently published EU Action Plan for Tourism Development 1997. In order to promote tourism in rural areas to be a destination for the new type of tourism, the land use control and facility guidelines have been be detailed in the regulation of the local governments under the suitable conciseness for the natural environmental and agricultural resources of the area. The regulation for planning control was not only be detailed but also be finished additional new technologies for ecological and cultural concerns, and for new systems for participatory approaches to be applied in the resource management supported by local residents. This research identified following issues ;1. The scope of the planning regulation for rural tourism development has been recogniz … More ed as resource management (landscape, natural environment, etc.) but not for agricultural promotion. The economic effect for agricultural sector is not accountable in rural tourism areas, but more general effects such as population trends and revitalization of local culture have been growing by the richness of new tourism activities.2. The planning regulation of resource management was supported by suitable facility guidelines and by the unique ideas (software) of local hospitality. The hospitalities for the various tourists in the rural areas has been developed by the local residents, especially in middle and young aged people, which recognize the value of their resources.3. The planning tools (land use, landscape, facilities, building design) are different in studied three countries, caused by the legal structure in the planning. Considering the other difference from Japanese legal system, the European planning tools for resource management and local ideas for rural hospitalities could be introduced in Japanese rural areas.The tourism activity in the rural areas is growing rapidly even in Japan. Therefore resource management is imperative and the planning control zone should cover all the municipal territories even in Japan. Rural tourism would require new discover of the resources, and contribute a sound regional development with charming territories which recall the population in rural areas. The Japanese local governments should recognize the importance of European experiences as a new policy for its territory, which could be realized by crossing over the administrative border and sectoral partitions and by the initiatives of regional administration level like a prefecture. Less
期刊论文(20)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
宗田 好史: "都市・農村交流のための地域整備課題-ソフト・ツーリズム時代の農村顧客層形成のために-" 『京都府立大学学術調査研究センター年報』. 第3号. 34-42 (1996)
宗田义文:《城乡交流的区域发展问题——软旅游时代乡村顾客的形成》京都府立大学学术研究中心年报第3. 34-42号(1996年)。
DOI: --
发表时间:
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: []
通讯作者:
パオラ・ファリ-ニ: "イタリアの町村の修復への取り込み" 『Re建築/保全』(財)日本建築保全センター. No.110. 16-23 (1997)
Paola Farini:“纳入意大利城镇和村庄的恢复”“Re Architecture/Conservation”日本建筑保护中心第 110 期 16-23(1997 年)。
DOI: --
发表时间:
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: []
通讯作者:
アルマンド・モンタナ-リ: "『21世紀の地域像/都市空港の文明論』「都市観光と田園観光/EUの観光政策」" 関西空港調査会発行, 194 (1997)
Armando Montana-Li:“‘21世纪区域形象/城市机场文明理论’‘城市旅游和乡村旅游/欧盟旅游政策’”关西机场研究会,194(1997)
DOI: --
发表时间:
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: []
通讯作者:
宗田好史: "アグロ・ツーリズム"への期待と取組〜先進地ヨーロッパのアグロ・ツーリズムの現状から" 丹波リゾート推進連絡協議会年報. 1-16 (1996)
Yoshifumi Muneta:“对“农业旅游”的期望和努力——来自发达欧洲农业旅游的现状”丹波度假村促进联络委员会年度报告1-16(1996)。
DOI: --
发表时间:
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: []
通讯作者:
20
    海外基金