A BASIC RESEARCH CONCERNING COLLECTIVE CONTROLS AGAINST OWNERSHIP OF LAND.

受法律控制的私人方式与其他方式有很大的不同。虽然人可以使用这些道路散步或开车，但他没有私人通行权，只有这种法律上的各种控制所产生的反射效应。当一条私人道路的所有权不受法律控制时，沿途的居民可以向相关政府机构提出索赔，以纠正这条道路。然而，该机构并不总是有义务服从他们的要求。在本研究中，我首先发现了在判决和文献中承认他们的剥夺继承权-要求干扰或要求损害赔偿对私人道路所有权的要求。接下来要考虑的是该法律的法律控制、私人道路的所有权及其通行利益之间的关系。最后，分析了居民剥夺继承权的条件和法律解释。总之，我的研究坚持认为，应该承认居民的剥夺继承权要求，因为我明白，只要能够获得居民的安全和健康，就必须保护居民的生命利益。

Private ways which are controled in a law (=Kenchikukijun-ho) are very different from the other ones. Though man can use such ways for a walk or drive, he has no private passage-right and only reflexive effect resulting from this legal various controls. When the ownership of a private way does not observe a legal control, inhabitants along the way are able to claim against relative government agency in oder to set that way right. However, this agency is not allways obliged to obey their claim.In this research, at first, I discovered judgements and literatures in which their disinheritance-demand of disturbance or demand for damages against the ownership of private way was recognized. Next considerations were concerned the relations among legal controls in that law, ownership of private way and its passage-interests. At last, I considered in which conditions and legal explanations inhabitants' disinheritance-demand should be recognized.My research, in conclusion, insisted that Inhabitants' disinheritance-demand should be recognised, because I understand that inhabitants' lifeinterests must be protected as far as their safety and health are able to be acquired.