Study on the Plasticity and Transfiguration of Aesop's Fables from the viewpoint of the illustration's Deviation

在《伊索寓言》的各种插图中，我们可以看到一些有趣的例子，比如1842年的格勒尼尔蚂蚁和蟋蟀，在拉方丹的插图中，两个女人代替昆虫出现在See中。这种不是动物的形象，而是人的形象，让读者感到尴尬，因为在寓言中，动物基本上是主角，在这个惯例下，我们理解了寓言所表示的寓言。格勒尼耶的解释方式更好地欺骗了寓言的策略，从而引出了修辞结构。这种变形的方式并不是他自己的专利，也不是19c在法国的其他插图画家，如Grandville，Monnier等。我们甚至可以指出很好的例子，即使在日本，如17c；Manji BAN Isoho Monogatari&gt；，当然，与这样的法国插图画家没有任何关联。这种以人代兽的插图风格，关系到寓言结构的本质。We c c…更重要的是，有时是寓言和面具。因此，我们可以看出，这样的插图只是揭开了他们的伪装，插画家们伸出了援助之手，摘掉了面具，剥离了个性。事实不仅如此，这里构思的基本结构：那就是寓言与戏剧，特别是与喜剧的亲和力。在寓言中，人格应该通过他们的伪装来展示寓言所蕴含的东西。插图策略刻意地移位人的形象，揭示寓言结构，凿出人格类型。它使读者、叙述者和人物的相对状况更加清晰，也给我们带来了寓言作为反讽的概念。书名/作者J.通过对个别插图风格的分析，笔者得出结论：插图的意义不仅是对文本的补充，更是寓言修辞戏剧理念的传播者。较少

Among various illustrations for Aesop's Fables, we can see some interesting examples like Grenier's <Ant and Cricket> in 1842, illustrated for < Fables> de La Fontaine, where in stead of insects two women are taken place in the seen. This kind of idea, not the image of animals but of the human being are represented, makes reader embarrassed, because in Fables in principle animal behaves as protagonist and under this convention, we understand an allegories that the fable signifies. Grenier's way of illustrate, all the better, deceives the strategy of the Fable and in consequence adduces the rhetorical structure. This way of transfiguration isn't his own patent or other illustrators in 19c in France such as Grandville, Monnier ,etc. We can indicate good examples even in Japan like in <Manji ban Isoho Monogatari> in 17c., without any correlation with such French illustrators, of course. This style of illustration, replacement man for animal, is related the essence of Fable structure. We c … More all sometimes the Fables <Masques>. We can therefore tell that such illustrations only throw off their disguise, and that the illustrators lend a hand to take off the masque and decorticate the personality. The fact is more than that Here the fundamental structure is conceived: that is affinity of Fable with Theater, especially with Comedy. In Fable, the personality should be looked through their guise to show what the fable teils. The strategy of illustration, intentionally displacement of the image of human being, reveals the Fable structure and chisels the type of personality. It makes much more clearer the relative situation of Reader, Narrator and Character, and brings us the idea of Fable as Irony as well.In this study, investigating H.Taine, A-M. Bassy, G.Couton. A.Thilly, and analyzing individual illustration's style by means of PC, I conclude that the meaning of illustration not only as a complement to text, but also the messenger of the idea of Fable-rhetoric as Theater without fail. Less