权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Research and Development of Performance Indicators in Academic Activities in Higher Education

高等教育学术活动绩效指标的研究与开发

基本信息

批准号：
13610302
负责人：
YAMASAKI Hirotoshi
金额：
$ 2.05万
依托单位：
HIROSHIMA UNIVERSIlY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2001
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2001 至 2003
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-13610302/
关键词：
higher education university teaching evaluation performance indicator assessment America 成果

项目摘要

In this project, three studies are done ; Survey of performance indicators in various levels of higher education system, application and development of performance indicators in Japanese higher education and assessment of college education.Firstly, performance indicators in various levels of higher education system in the U.K. and the U.S.A. are collected and surveyed. How teaching, learning, study, research, social services and so on in higher education system are measured, assessed and evaluated are examined. Various types of input, output, process and outcome indicators and performance funding in the several states in U.S.A. are examined.Secondly, the most common indicators in U.K. and U.S.A. completion rate and achievement, can be applied in Japan. Other several indicators can be used for the assessment of education in Japan.Thirdly, according to our study, completion rate in four year college was some 8.8 percent, much higher than that of U.K.(14.4%) and U.S.A.(some 36%). Math achievement of college students in Japan is also higher than that of U.S.A..However, direct international comparison of raw figures of these indicators is limited, because of cultural and social differences of system of higher education in countries. Instead, comparison among sectors of higher education and among institutions of higher education seems to be better.

在这个项目中，做了三个研究；各层次高等教育体系绩效指标概览、日本高等教育绩效指标的应用与发展及大学教育评估。首先，收集和调查了英美两国各级高等教育系统的绩效指标。高等教育系统中的教学、学习、研究、研究、社会服务等如何被衡量、评估和评估。考察了美国几个州的各种类型的投入、产出、过程和结果指标以及绩效资金。其次，英国和美国最常见的指标，完成率和成绩，可以适用于日本。其他几个指标可用于评估日本的教育。第三，根据我们的研究，四年制大学的完成率约为8.8%，远高于英国（14.4%）和美国（约36%）。日本大学生的数学成绩也高于美国。然而，由于各国高等教育制度的文化和社会差异，对这些指标的原始数据进行直接的国际比较是有限的。相反，高等教育部门之间和高等教育机构之间的比较似乎更好。