权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A genealogical study of small credit policies in Sri Lanka: development agencies and anthropology of knowledge

斯里兰卡小额信贷政策的谱系研究：发展机构和知识人类学

基本信息

批准号：
13610358
负责人：
ADACHI Akira
金额：
$ 1.92万
依托单位：
KYOTO UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2001
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2001 至 2002
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

We aimed to examine the genealogy of micro-credit scheme in Sri Lanka during 1990' s, that is Janasaviya and Smurudhi program. A main question here was why the Grameen Bank model had been selected by most policies in South Asian countries. We attempted to analyze the policy-making process in terms of a particular dynamism of knowledge among development agencies and consultancies in Sri Lanka. It was meant by "a particular dynamism" that knowledge produced by organization tends to converge into a dominant one in a competitive situation or market situation as DiMaggio and Powell (1983) discussed in "The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields".Although we could not complete our analyses during these two years due to too much data gathered, the following two points are made clear:1. Through reading conference documents and interview data on Janasaviya and Samurudhi programs, the convergence of micro-credit policy into the Grameen Bank model were found to be due to a mode of bureaucracy in which most bureaucrats and technocrats were keen interested in keeping a safest 'form' of policy-making for themselves without considering the contents and supposed results.2. Those who were engaged with the policy-making hardly remembered what they discussed with their colleagues on micro-credits. It seems to us that they were concerned with only an empty form of policy as A. Riles (2000) described in The network inside out. This point led us to think about memory of development as discusses in our Report here.As mentioned already, we will continue our analyses of data gathered in this research and publish another report soon.

我们的目的是研究20世纪90年代斯里兰卡小额信贷计划的谱系，即Janasaviya和Smurudhi计划。这里的一个主要问题是，为什么南亚国家的大多数政策选择了格拉米银行模式。我们试图分析的政策制定过程中的一个特定的发展机构和咨询机构之间的知识活力在斯里兰卡。“一种特殊的动力”是指，在竞争或市场环境中，组织产生的知识往往会汇聚成一种占主导地位的知识，正如DiMaggio和Powell（1983）在“重新审视铁笼：组织场域中的制度同构与集体理性”，虽然这两年由于资料太多，未能完成分析，明确了两点：一是要坚持以人为本，通过阅读关于Janasaviya和Samurudhi计划的会议文件和访谈数据，发现小额信贷政策与乡村银行模式的融合是由于官僚主义模式，其中大多数官僚和技术官僚热衷于为自己保留一种最安全的政策制定“形式”，而不考虑内容和预期结果。那些参与决策的人几乎不记得他们与同事就小额信贷问题讨论了什么。在我们看来，他们所关心的只是一种空洞的政策形式，如A。Riles（2000）在The Network Inside Out中描述了这一点。这一点促使我们思考发展的记忆，正如我们在这里的报告中所讨论的那样。正如已经提到的，我们将继续分析这项研究中收集的数据，并很快发表另一份报告。