A Functional-Typological Study of Discourse Modality Expressions in Japanese and Korean : With Special Attention to the Contrasts between Japanese-Korean and English-Germany

日语和韩语语篇情态表达的功能类型学研究:特别关注日韩语和英德语之间的对比

• 批准号: 13610648
• 负责人: HORIE Kaoru
• 金额: $ 0.9万
• 依托单位: Tohoku University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2001
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2001 至 2002
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-13610648/
• 关键词: discourse modality; grammaticalization; contrastive linguistics; comparative typology; Japanese-Korean contrastive linguistics; complementation; cognitive typology; interrelationship between linguistic structure and cultural values; 命題とモダリティ; 談話と

(1) There were cross-linguistic differences in terms of linguistic coding ofmodality and discourse modality between Japanese and Korean. Specifically, it was found that Japanese preferentially grammaticalizes discourse modality by means of sentence-final particles, while Korean prioritizes non-discourse modality. This observation was presented in Horie and Taira (2002).(2) A semantic contrast in form-meaning mapping, e.g "polyfunctionality vs., semantic specificity" is observed between Japanese and Korean, parallel to the contrast between English and German. This contrast is observed in such grammatical phenomena like complementation and negation in Japanese and Korean. This observation was presented in Horie (2002a), Horie (2002b), and Horie and Moriya (2002).(3) The contrast suggested in (2) requires a contrastive analysis of two linguistic communities(Japan and Korea) in terms of cultural values. An approach incorporating linguistic and socio-cultural analyses is thus suggested along the line of Cognitive Typology (Horie 2002c).(4) Along the line of (4), a cognitive-typological analysis of borrowing phenomena in Japanese and Korean was presented, suggesting that Japanese is more receptive toward loanwords than Korean (Horie 2002d).

(1)日语和韩语在情态和话语情态的语言编码方面存在着跨语言差异。具体来说，日语倾向于通过助动词来语法化话语情态，而韩语则倾向于语法化非话语情态。Horie和Taira（2002年）提出了这一观察结果。(2)形式-意义映射中的语义对比，例如“多功能性与”，与英语和德语的对比一样，日语和韩语之间也存在“语义特异性”。这种对比在日语和韩语中的补语和否定等语法现象中也有体现。Horie（2002 a）、Horie（2002 b）以及Horie和Moriya（2002）提出了这一观察结果。(3)（2）中提出的对比要求对两个语言社区（日本和韩国）的文化价值观进行对比分析。因此，沿着认知类型学（Horie 2002 c）的路线，提出了一种结合语言和社会文化分析的方法。(4)沿着（4）的思路，对日语和韩语中的借用现象进行了认知类型学分析，表明日语比韩语更容易接受外来词（Horie 2002 d）。

项目成果

Kaoru Horie, Kaori Taira: "Where Japanese and Korean differ : Modality vs. discourse modality"Japanese/Korean Linguistics. 10. 178-191 (2002)

Kaoru Horie、Kaori Taira：“日语和韩语的不同之处：情态与话语情态”日韩语言学。

Moriya, Tetsuharu & Horie, Kaoru: "Grammaticalization and Semantic Typology : Time-relationship adverbs in Japanese, Korean, English and German"Proceedings of the 16th Pacific Asia Conference. 348-357 (2002)

森谷哲治

Kaoru Horie: "Verbal Nouns in Japanese and Korean : Cognitive Typological Implications"文化・インターアクション・言語(ひつじ書房). 77-101 (2002)

Kaoru Horie：“日语和韩语中的动词名词：认知类型学含义”文化、互动、语言（Hitsuji Shobo）77-101（2002）。

堀江 薫: "認知類型論(Cognitive Typology)の史的展開と最新動向"英語青年(研究社). 1848. 680-683 (2002)

Kaoru Horie：“认知类型学的历史发展和最新趋势”英国青年（Kenkyusha）1848。680-683（2002）。

Horie, Kaoru & Debra Occhi: "Cognitive Linguistics Meets Language-Contact"Cognitive-Functional Linguistics in an East Asian context. 13-33 (2001)

堀江薰