权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

The Problem of the So-called Hellenist Theology in the Early Christianity

早期基督教中所谓希腊化神学的问题

基本信息

批准号：
14510034
负责人：
OGAWA Akira
金额：
$ 0.96万
依托单位：
Rikkyo University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2004
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-14510034/
关键词：
Hellenist Hellenist and Hebrews The Acts of the Apostles Hellenistic Jewish Christianity History of Early Christianity 新約聖書学ヘレニストユダヤ人キリスト教古代キリスト教使途言行録

项目摘要

This is a re-examination of the problem of the so-called Hellenists in the Acts of the Apostles. In view of the recent critical opinions against the Hellenist theology as a missing link between Jesus and Paul in the history of early Christian traditions, I have made a brief survey of the research trend and presented an analysis of the relevant passages in the Acts of the Apostles.I confirmed the following points.1)The use of the words <Hellenists> and <Hebrews> in the Book of Acts is determined by purely linguistic viewpoint, and the usage gives no basis for supposing the existence of two groups of its own distinct theology.2)The exegesis of Acts 6:1-6 gives no ground for supposing the dispute and opposition between the two theologically distinctive groups in the early Jerusalem Church.3)There is no evidence for supposing a selective persecution, which afflicted only the Hellenist Christians.4)The analysis of the story of the Stephen's martyrdom does not justify the interpretation that … More he criticized the Jewish Law and the Temple.5)It is probable that the Evangelist Luke made use of a source in describing the speech of Stephen in Acts 7. However, the source, which may be traced back to the Hellenists, does not prove that the theology of the Hellenist was critical to the Law. It proves that they had, on the contrary, a high respect for the Law. We can infer from the speech that the Hellenists' theology was rather critical to the Temple, and that it shared presumably the critical attitude against the Temple with the contemporary Diaspora Judaism.6)There is no sound ground for the hypothesis that the Hellenists' theology originated before the Apostle Paul in the Antiochian Church.7)The first century churches built a tight communication network and were related with each other very closely so that it seems very doubtful that one church or group developed its own distinctive theology in isolation from other churches or groups in early stages of Christianity. It makes very problematic to suppose that two groups within one and the same Jerusalem Church have developed each its own theology. Less

这是对使徒行传中所谓的希腊化问题的重新审视。针对近年来对希腊化神学的批评，认为希腊化神学是早期基督教传统史上耶稣与保罗之间缺失的一环，笔者对希腊化神学的研究趋势作了简要的梳理，并对《使徒行传》中的相关段落进行了分析，证实了以下几点：1）《使徒行传》中和的使用<Hellenists><Hebrews>是由纯粹的语言学观点决定的，2）使徒行传6：1-6的注释没有给出任何理由来假设早期耶路撒冷教会中两个神学上不同的群体之间的争论和对立。3）没有任何证据来假设一种选择性的迫害，这种迫害只折磨希腊基督徒。4）对司提反殉难故事的分析并不能证明以下解释是合理的： ...更多信息他批评了犹太律法和圣殿。5）很可能福音传道者路加在描述使徒行传第七章中司提反的讲话时使用了一个来源。然而，来源，这可能是追溯到Hellenists，并不能证明神学的Hellenist是关键的法律。相反，这证明了他们对法律的高度尊重。我们可以从演讲中推断出，希腊化的神学是相当关键的圣殿，而且，它共享大概与当代散居犹太教对圣殿的批判态度。6）有没有健全的假设，即希腊神学起源于使徒保罗在安提奥奇亚教会的理由。7）第一世纪的教会建立了一个紧密的沟通网络，并与对方非常密切，使它似乎非常怀疑，一个教会或团体发展自己独特的神学孤立于其他教会或基督教早期的团体。这使得非常有问题的假设，两个团体内的一个和同一个耶路撒冷教会已经发展了自己的神学。少