Study of the Controversy on history between Japan and Korea

通过本研究，我可以从两个方面拓宽我对日韩历史论战的看法：一是儒家等传统思想的问题;二是战后意识形态影响的问题。即研究东亚“主体”和韩国“反日思想”中的儒家或意识形态因素。重新解读近代西方的“主体”一词，站在儒家传统的立场上，我们可以重新解读“作为”在历史上的意义。从而区分出日朝历史争论的特殊性和普遍性。这样我们就可以构建东亚的哲学基础。

Through this study, I could broaden my viewpoint about the controversy on history between Japan and Korea, on two points.1.The problem of the traditional thoughts like Confucianism etc.2.The problem of the ideological influences in postwar period.In other words, I studied about Confucian or ideological factors in EastAsian "subject" and "anti-Japan thought" in Korea.Reinterpreting the "subject" which is the term of modern West, over the point of the Confucian tradition, we could reinterpret the meaning of the "act" in the history. And then we can distinguish the particularity and universality in the controversy on history between Japan and Korea. So then we could construct the philosophical foundation of East Asia.