Theoretical and Descriptive Study of the Auxiliary Verb Systems in Natural Languages

自然语言助动词系统的理论和描述性研究

• 批准号: 16320061
• 负责人: WASHIO Ryuichi
• 金额: $ 5.91万
• 依托单位: University of Tsukuba
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
• 财政年份: 2004
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2004 至 2007
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-16320061/
• 关键词: passive; auxiliary selection; auxiliary verb constructions; origins of auxiliary verb constructions; Germanic languages; Asian languages; synchronic variation; diachronic change; 通事的変化; アジア言語; 英語; パラメータ; 自由与格; オランダ語; ドイツ語

The present research looked into the possible interrelations among the following properties of Modern English, contrasting them with those found in other Germanic languages such as German and Dutch. (1) English lacks impersonal passives (unlike German/Dutch), (2) English lacks auxiliary selection (unlike German/Dutch), (3) verbs in the present tense generally lack imperfective interpretation in English (unlike German/Dutch), (4) English has the periphrastic BE+Ving construction (unlike German/Dutch), (5) passives in English involve the auxiliary verb BE (not BECOME as in German/Dutch), (6) English, like Dutch and unlike German, largely lacks case distinctions, (7) English allows dative passives (unlike German/Dutch), (8) the so-called free datives are severely restricted in English (like Dutch and unlike German), (9) the present perfect construction generally disallows the occurrence of adverbs like YESTERDAY (unlike German/Dutch), (10) English has the causative construction based on the verb HAVE (unlike German/Dutch). After identifying some crucial interrelations holding among these properties, the present research examined Japanese and other Asian languages to see if similar generalizations hold in typologically/genealogically different languages. Our research shows that properties (2) and (9), for instance, do tend to correlate across languages of different types.

本研究研究了现代英语的以下特性之间的可能相互关系，将它们与其他日耳曼语言（例如德语和荷兰语）的相互关系进行了对比。 （1）英语缺乏非个人化的被动式（与德国/荷兰语不同），（2）英语缺乏辅助选择（与德国/荷兰语不同），（3）当前时态中的动词通常缺乏英语中的不完善解释（与德语/荷兰语不同）（与德语不同），（4）英语的英语具有范围的范围+ving be+ving be+ving begriand ins in Begriance in Begribe（5），（5）涉及A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A组成（5）。 German/Dutch), (6) English, like Dutch and unlike German, largely lacks case distinctions, (7) English allows dative passives (unlike German/Dutch), (8) the so-called free datives are severely restricted in English (like Dutch and unlike German), (9) the present perfect construction generally disallows the occurrence of adverbs like YESTERDAY (unlike German/Dutch), (10) English has the causative construction based on the动词有（与德国/荷兰语不同）。在确定了这些属性之间存在一些关键的相互关系之后，本研究研究了日语和其他亚洲语言，以查看类似于类型/家谱上不同语言的类似概括是否存在。我们的研究表明，例如（2）和（9）的属性确实倾向于在不同类型的语言之间关联。

项目成果

ソシュールにおける絶対的多様性の概念

索绪尔的绝对多样性概念

• 发表时间: 2007
• 作者: OYA;Toshiaki;鷲尾龍一
• 通讯作者: 鷲尾龍一

On Saussure's notion "diversite absolue" : In comparison with Sapir's view on linguistic prehistory

论索绪尔的“多样性绝对”观念:与萨丕尔的语言史前史观比较

• 发表时间: 2008
• 期刊: Bulletin of the Edward Sapir Society of Japan 22
• 作者: WASHIO;Ryuichi
• 通讯作者: Ryuichi

Tokieda, Motooki

时枝、本木

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 12
• 作者: Washio;Ryuichi
• 通讯作者: Ryuichi

ソシュールにおける絶対的多様性の概念〜サピアとの比較を視野に〜

索绪尔的绝对多样性概念：与萨丕尔的比较

• 发表时间: 2008
• 期刊: 日本エドワード・サピア協会研究年報 22
• 作者: 狩俣 繁久;島袋幸子;SUGAWARA Katsuya;高江洲 頼子;SUGAWARA Katsuya;狩俣 繁久;SUGAWARA Katsuya;TOKUMORI Makoto;狩俣 繁久;LIU Anwei;狩俣 繁久;菅原克也;狩俣 繁久;SUGAWARA Katsuya.;狩俣 繁久;菅原克也;高江洲 頼子;高江洲 頼子;鷲尾龍一
• 通讯作者: 鷲尾龍一

Unaccusativity and East Asian Languages : Issues and Prospects

非宾格与东亚语言:问题与前景

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan 253
• 作者: WASHIO;Ryuichi
• 通讯作者: Ryuichi