权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

International Comparison Study for Women's Policy between Japan, US, Denmark and Korea

日本、美国、丹麦、韩国妇女政策国际比较研究

基本信息

批准号：
16330121
负责人：
SUGIMOTO Kiyoe
金额：
$ 5.82万
依托单位：
Kinjogakuin-University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2004
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2004 至 2006
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-16330121/
关键词：
Social Welfare Gender Women's Policy Child Support Single Mother Income Distribution Female-Headed Family Woman's Labor シングルファーザー養育権

项目摘要

To identify the relationship between the Welfare State and women as an objective, we have selected three different countries which have each own Welfare System and Japan and/then conducted comparative research internationally. This is to clarify the gender oriented features of the Welfare State of Japan and their issues.The interview has been conducted with 20 single mothers each in Japan, the United States, Demark and Korea. The research, thereby, has been conducted for the actual condition of practice of the Social Welfare Policy for single mothers, its issues as well the same of life of single mothers in each country.Per the results of research, it is revealed that the disparity between the Scandinavian system of Demark, where the nation participates in Women's Policy (Social Policy in general) significantly and the noninterference system of the United States. Accordingly, it is confirmed that Japan and Korea are situated at the middle of those two.Hereby, in Japan and Korea as well, which are positioned at the middle of the Scandinavian and American systems, the movement of equality for men and women are stagnated, comparing to former two, thus it is evident that the Women's Policy is weaken.There, the "Gender Issues" accompanied with single mothers become more serious condition. It can be said that depending upon the practice of equality society between men and women, the enforcement of Women's Policy (Social Welfare Policy) is significantly affected accordingly.

为了确定福利国家与妇女之间的关系作为目标，我们选择了三个拥有各自福利制度的不同国家和日本，然后进行国际比较研究。这是为了澄清日本福利国家的性别特征及其问题。采访对象是日本、美国、丹麦和韩国各20名单亲母亲。因此，本研究针对各国单亲母亲社会福利政策的实际实施情况、其问题以及单亲母亲的生活进行了研究。研究结果表明，丹麦的斯堪的纳维亚制度与美国的不干涉制度之间存在显着差异。丹麦的斯堪的纳维亚制度是国家参与妇女政策（一般社会政策）的制度。据此，可以确认日本和韩国处于这两个国家的中间位置。由此可见，在位于斯堪的纳维亚体系和美国体系中间的日本和韩国，男女平等运动较前两国都停滞不前，妇女政策的弱化显而易见。在那里，与单亲母亲相伴的“性别问题”变得更加严重。可以说，随着男女平等社会的实践，妇女政策（社会福利政策）的执行也相应受到很大影响。