权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

The judicial function of judicialethics and the application there of to the education and training of the legal profession

司法道德的司法功能及其在法律职业教育培训中的应用

基本信息

批准号：
18330020
负责人：
MORIGIWA Yasutomo
金额：
$ 5.39万
依托单位：
Nagoya University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2006
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2006 至 2007
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-18330020/
关键词：
judicial ethics best practice excelling interpretation of law independence of the judiciary impartiality CSR public private dichotomy the third generation of judicial ethics 法曹倫理司法制度社会正義法解釈不偏不党性

项目摘要

This project had two objectives. Firstly, to provide the theoretical grounds necessary far the legal ethics training of the legal profession at the law school by developing the foundations of such a theory thorough the study of the judicial function of legal ethics in action. Secondly, to feed back the fruits of the study to the field of legal theory, thus furnishing the material necessary for the developing of a new method of the study of law and accompanying theories.Concerning the first objective, findings are published in the Hanrei Times vol.1251 (2007) and further findings were presented and discussed at the International Symposium on Judicial Ethics held on 1 December 2007, in Tokyo. At the symposium, the concept of <judicial ethics as best practice> was introduced, about which comments and discussion continue to flow in to the chief investigator, from judges and those responsible for teaching legal ethics in law schools in Japan.As for the second objective, again, major finding … More s were presented in the above article and symposium. The main theme of the research was the comparative study of judicial ethics between France and Japan. The main message sent out was thus In order far the judiciary to properly function in a liberal democracy, freedom of legal interpretation secured through the independence of the judiciary is a prerequisite. In France, although the constitution of the state does not anticipate the type of independence fit far a judiciary of a liberal democracy, the judiciary is nevertheless independent enough to fulfill by and large the task of such a judiciary. What is it that enables the judge to avoid arbitrariness in the interpretation of law? What is it that allows for the preservation and enhancement of the credibility of the judiciary? The content of judicial ethics was analyzed in this context, In addition to the probable masons such as motivation to promotion inhibiting license, especially interpretations that tend to be overturned at the appellate level, the ethos the caps of the judiciary was introduced as another possible element The institutional, political conditions and the content of the ethos of such a judicial ethic were then proposed for critical analysis We believe that the fundamental characteristics of a viable judicial ethic in a liberal democracy can thus be established. If so, it would follow that the content and standard of acceptable and evening interpretation of law should be identified not only by the methods by which the judge finds the law, but also by the level of independence of the judiciary and the content of the ethics of the judge that filters out inference based on the wrong reasons Such an integrated view of legal interpretation would be necessary in future investigations of the subject We believe that such an institutional view would bring about a renovation of how we theorize about law and its interpretation. Less

该项目有两个目标。第一，通过对法律的伦理在实践中的司法功能的研究，发展法律伦理学的理论基础，为法学院的法律的职业培训提供必要的理论依据。第二，将研究成果反馈到法律的理论领域，为发展新的法学研究方法和相关理论提供必要的材料。调查结果发表在Hanrei Times vol.1251（2007）上，进一步的调查结果在2007年12月1日举行的司法伦理国际研讨会上提出和讨论，在东京在研讨会上介绍了“法律伦理学”的概念<judicial ethics as best practice>，日本的法官和法学院负责教授法律的伦理学的人士对这一概念进行了评论和讨论。 ...更多信息在上述文章和研讨会上提出了。研究的主题是法日两国司法伦理的比较研究。因此，所发出的主要信息是：为了使司法机关在自由民主国家中正常运作，通过司法机关的独立性确保法律的解释自由是一个先决条件。在法国，虽然国家宪法没有规定自由民主国家的司法机构应有的独立性，但司法机构的独立性足以基本上完成这种司法机构的任务。是什么使法官在解释法律时避免武断？是什么可以维护和增强司法机关的公信力？在此背景下分析了司法伦理的内容，除了可能的泥瓦匠，如动机晋升抑制许可证，特别是解释，往往被推翻在上诉一级，精神的司法帽被引入作为另一个可能的因素，制度，政治条件和这种司法伦理的精神气质的内容，然后提出批判性的分析。自由民主的道德规范就可以建立起来。如果是这样的话，那么，法律的可接受的和公正的解释的内容和标准就不仅应该通过法官发现法律的方法来确定，但也取决于司法机关的独立程度和法官的道德内容，这种道德内容过滤掉基于错误理由的推理，这种对法律的解释的综合看法在未来对这一主题的研究中是必要的。我们相信，这样一种制度化的观点将带来我们如何对法律及其解释进行理论化的革新。少