Oltre Freud? On dream aesthetics in Italian literary modernity: Italo Svevo, Federigo Tozzi, Carlo Emilio Gadda

奥特雷·弗洛伊德？

• 批准号: 73520204
• 负责人: Professorin Dr. Marie Guthmüller
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Institut für Romanistik
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2008
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2007-12-31 至 2014-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/73520204?language=en
• 关键词: Oltre; Freud; dream; aesthetics; Italian

The monograph in progress on the dream aesthetics of literary modernity in Italy pursues a chiastic perspective. It provides a view of the development of dream studies in the 19th and early 20th centuries "beyond Freud" - to this point little researched - as well as a look at the genealogy and the potential of the aesthetic processes of Italian modernity. Central to this endeavor are the prose texts of Italo Svevo, Federigo Tozzi and, in the context of this renewal request, Carlo Emilio Gadda as well as psychiatric, philosophical, psychological and physiological texts about sleeping and dreaming. Because of the long-delayed reception of Freud in Italian psychology and psychiatry, there is a specific, tense relationship between scientific dream research on the one hand and the ostensibly "Freudian" literary engagement with dreaming on the other.Processing what was known at the time about the psycho-physiological aspects of dreaming allows us to determine the concepts of dreams held by the aforementioned authors historically "beyond Freud" and creates the basis for an analysis of their dream aesthetic. In using the central role that dreaming plays as a theme, topos and narrative model in works by authors such as Svevo, Tozzi, Luigi Pirandello and Alberto Savinio - in other words, by authors who distance themselves from a mimetic-referential concept of literature in their poetic reflection and who work on the development of a 'scrittura moderna' - the project investigates the question of how processes of recording dreams become a model of anti-mimetic writing in Italy's literary modernity.In the context of this renewal application, the analysis will be expanded by including the short stories and novels of Carlo Emilio Gadda, whose relevance for the structure of the project has proven itself in the research done in the last few years. After Tozzi, who never read Freud's Interpretation of Dreams, and Svevo, who did not know Freud's works during the first phase of his writing, and who in a second phase engaged with it in a way that was simultaneously affirming and ironic, Gadda stands, from the beginning of his oeuvre on, in a critical dialogue with the founder of psychoanalysis. He reflects Freud's conception of dreaming in his theoretical writings before he systematically circumvents them in his literary texts. By focusing on the differential sign structure of dreams and the ambivalent role of language, whose lacking basic reflection, as Jacques Lacan will later emphasize, represents a blind spot of Freudian psychoanalysis, Gadda opens a new poetological dimension, whose significance should be researched. According to my hypothesis, in Gadda's short stories and novels the possibilities and limitations of modernity's dream aesthetic can be paradigmatically demonstrated.

正在进行的关于意大利文学现代性的梦美学的专著追求一种交错的视角。它提供了19世纪和20世纪早期“超越弗洛伊德”的梦研究发展的观点——到目前为止，研究很少——以及对意大利现代性美学过程的谱系和潜力的研究。这一努力的核心是伊塔洛·斯韦沃、费德里戈·托齐的散文文本，以及在这一更新要求的背景下，卡洛·埃米利奥·加达的散文文本，以及关于睡眠和做梦的精神病学、哲学、心理学和生理学文本。由于意大利心理学和精神病学对弗洛伊德的接受姗姗来迟，因此，一方面，科学的梦研究与另一方面，表面上的“弗洛伊德”文学对梦的参与之间存在着一种特定的、紧张的关系。处理当时已知的梦的心理生理方面，使我们能够确定上述作者在历史上“超越弗洛伊德”所持有的梦的概念，并为分析他们的梦美学创造基础。使用梦想扮演的中心角色作为主题,主题和叙事模式等的作品作者的那些,Tozzi,路易吉皮兰德娄,阿尔贝托Savinio——换句话说,通过作者远离mimetic-referential概念的文学诗歌反射和工作的发展“scrittura现代化”——项目调查的问题如何处理记录的梦想成为模特anti-mimetic写在意大利的文学现代性。在这个更新申请的背景下，分析将被扩展，包括卡洛·埃米利奥·加达的短篇小说和小说，其与项目结构的相关性在过去几年中所做的研究中得到了证明。托齐从未读过弗洛伊德的《梦的解析》，斯韦沃在弗洛伊德写作的第一阶段并不知道他的作品，在第二阶段，他以一种同时肯定和讽刺的方式参与其中，加达从他的作品开始，就站在与精神分析学创始人的批判性对话中。他在他的理论著作中反映了弗洛伊德的梦的概念，然后在他的文学文本中系统地规避了它们。通过关注梦的差异符号结构和语言的矛盾角色，正如雅克·拉康后来强调的那样，语言缺乏基本的反思，代表了弗洛伊德精神分析的盲点，Gadda打开了一个新的诗学维度，其意义值得研究。根据我的假设，在Gadda的短篇小说和长篇小说中，现代性梦美学的可能性和局限性可以被范例地展示出来。