DESIGN MATTERS? THE EFFECTS OF NEW SCHOOLS ON STUDENTS', TEACHERS' AND PARENTS' ACTIONS AND PERCEPTIONS

设计很重要吗？

• 批准号: AH/J011924/1
• 负责人: Harry Daniels
• 金额: $ 53.95万
• 依托单位: University of Bath
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2012
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2012 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FJ011924%2F1
• 关键词: DESIGN; MATTERS; EFFECTS; NEW; SCHOOLS

The project will investigate the effects of newly designed schools on their users, particularly students and teachers. This addresses an important policy issue but also has implications for architectural practice, educational theory and methodology. The research is of particular and immediate policy importance. During the 2000s, the UK government invested heavily in the Building Schools for the Future and Academy programmes, commissioning a number of architect-designed new schools at relatively high cost. Since 2010 the policy rhtetoric has shifted to the need for more standardised designs at much lower cost. Needless to say, large amounts of public money are at stake, and the findings are of international as well as national interest. The research base for making such judgments is remarkably thin, on three fronts. First, there is insufficient clarity about how educational theory should underpin decisions in this area, in terms of informing both commissioners of new schools and the architects who will design them. Secondly, the empirical research base is very limited, regarding the importance of the visuo-spatial (place and space) in learning and teaching, and in the general creation of a suitable educational environment, and also regarding the effectiveness of newly designed schools. Current post-occupancy evaluations tend to be tightly focused on specific environmental issues such as energy use. Thirdly, the literature on research methods to tackle issues such as this is still relatively limited. While there is sufficient for us to undertake the project with confidence, we will undoubtedly be able to offer new insights for future researchers in what remains an underresearched field. The research team brings together leading academic researchers in education (recognised for contributions to both theory and methodology, and with considerable experience of empirical work in schools) with leading architects in the field of school design, supported by representatives from their principal professional bodies. We shall use a variety of methods, both 'first person' (including interviews and written accounts) and 'third person' (including observations and documentary and data analysis) in order to arrive at by far the most comprehensive account yet of the differences (should there be any) that newly designed schools, of a variety of types, make to children's educational experience, to teachers, and to other users of the schools. This will inform the policy debate as well as making contributions to theory, which in education is limited on the issue of how school spaces are appropriated as learning and social spaces, and in architecture is limited in terms of designing for specifically educational outcomes. We have agreement from five schools built since 2007 under the Building Schools for the Future and Academy programmes. They represent different designs by FeildenCleggBradley, who are acknowledged as one of the leading firms in the field of school design. We will follow children from their feeder primary schools (some of which are also new-build) into the newly designed secondaries, alongside children from those primary schools who move to older secondary schools as a control. Thus we will be able to follow children from new primary to new secondary, old primary to new secondary, new primary to old secondary, and old primary to old secondary, though the majority will be studied in the newly built schools. The sample will comprise about 300 children in total. The project is supported by RIBA and BCSE. The project will run for 36 months, in five phases, as detailed in the Case for Support. Its progress will be informed by a steering group involving professional architects and those involved in school building policy as well as the project team. The outcomes will be disseminated widely, through academic and professional channels, in order to maxmise impact for academics, architects, policy makers and users

该项目将调查新设计的学校对其使用者，特别是学生和教师的影响。这解决了一个重要的政策问题，但也有建筑实践，教育理论和方法的影响。这项研究具有特别和直接的政策重要性。在2000年代，英国政府在未来学校建设和学院项目上投入了大量资金，以相对较高的成本委托了一些建筑师设计的新学校。自2010年以来，政策法规已经转向以更低的成本实现更标准化的设计。不用说，这关系到大量公共资金，调查结果关系到国际和国家利益。 在三个方面，做出这种判断的研究基础非常薄弱。首先，教育理论应该如何支撑这一领域的决策，在通知新学校的专员和将设计它们的建筑师方面，还不够明确。第二，实证研究的基础是非常有限的，关于视觉空间（地点和空间）在学习和教学中的重要性，在一般创造一个合适的教育环境，以及关于新设计的学校的有效性。目前的使用后评价往往紧紧侧重于能源使用等具体环境问题。第三，关于解决这类问题的研究方法的文献仍然相对有限。虽然我们有足够的信心开展该项目，但我们无疑将能够为未来的研究人员提供新的见解，这仍然是一个研究不足的领域。该研究团队汇集了教育领域领先的学术研究人员（公认的理论和方法论贡献，并在学校的实证工作相当丰富的经验）与学校设计领域的领先建筑师，由他们的主要专业机构的代表支持。我们将使用多种方法，包括“第一人称”（包括访谈和书面陈述）和“第三人”（包括观察、文件和数据分析），以便对新设计的各种类型的学校对儿童的教育经历、教师和学校的其他使用者造成的差异（如果有任何差异的话）作出迄今为止最全面的说明。这将为政策辩论提供信息，并为理论做出贡献，在教育方面，理论仅限于如何将学校空间用作学习和社会空间的问题，而在建筑方面，理论仅限于为特定的教育成果设计。自2007年以来，我们在未来学校建设和学院计划下建造了五所学校。它们代表了FeildenCleggBradley的不同设计，FeildenCleggBradley被公认为学校设计领域的领先公司之一。我们将跟踪来自附属小学（其中一些也是新建的）的孩子进入新设计的中学，并与来自那些小学的孩子一起进入旧中学作为对照。这样，我们便可以跟随学童由新小学升读新中学、由旧小学升读新中学、由新小学升读旧中学、由旧小学升读旧中学，虽然大部分学童会在新建的学校就读。样本将包括总共约300名儿童。该项目得到了RIBA和BCSE的支持。该项目将运行36个月，分五个阶段，详见支助案例。由专业建筑师和参与学校建设政策的人员以及项目小组组成的指导小组将通报其进展情况。这些成果将通过学术和专业渠道广泛传播，以最大限度地扩大对学术界、建筑师、决策者和用户的影响。