权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Self-recovery housing for development: scaling up crisis preparedness and humanitarian shelter response

自我恢复住房促进发展：加强危机准备和人道主义住房应对

基本信息

批准号：
EP/T015160/1
负责人：
Cathrine Brun
金额：
$ 87.94万
依托单位：
Oxford Brookes University
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2019
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2019 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP%2FT015160%2F1
关键词：
Self recovery housing development scaling

项目摘要

This project builds directly upon two previous GCRF awards: 1 NERC Resilience Foundation Award: Promoting Safer Building - Using science, technology, communication and humanitarian practice to support family and community self-recovery. 2 British Academy Cities and Infrastructure: Safer self-recovery: promoting resilient urban reconstruction after disasters. The key findings of both these projects are described in the Business Case. For more on the findings of previous GCRF awards see: https://www.odi.org/publications/10963-self-recovery-disasters-interdisciplinary-perspectiveEarthquakes, storms, floods, and conflict cause untold damage to infrastructure, services, agriculture and livelihoods. The destruction of housing is often most visible, and the most devastating to the families, with often hundreds of thousands of homes destroyed. Householders themselves are invariably the first to respond; they are never passive, and signs of shelter recovery are very apparent from the first days after a disaster. The majority - as many as 80 or 90% - receive little or no assistance from the international community and are the main drivers of their own recovery process. This process has been termed 'self-recovery'. The previous GCRF awards supported interdisciplinary teams led by ODI in collaboration with CARE International UK, BGS, UCL and Loughborough University. They developed the understanding of the self-recovery process and advanced the theoretical basis for humanitarian assistance to the process of supporting self-recovery in practice . In large part as a result of this work, self-recovery is now a strategic element of the humanitarian shelter sector discourse with many disaster responses purporting to support this inevitable process. In recognition of the value of a people-centred approach that moves away from the convention product-based modalities, the CARE Philippines post-cyclone self-recovery project won the 2018 World Habitat Award in acknowledgment of its self-recovery focus. Sixteen thousand houses were built, each one unique and reflecting the priorities and means of each family. https://www.world-habitat.org/world-habitat-awards/winners-and-finalists/post-haiyan-self-recovery-housing-programme/The self-recovery approach that respects the primacy of agency and choice aligns well with current humanitarian and development concerns such as the 'humanitarian development nexus', the Grand Bargain's emphasis on localisation, participation and cash-based responses, the Sendai Framework on Disaster Risk Reduction, the Sustainable Development Goals and the Global Shelter Cluster strategy. This is further explained in the Business Case. However, very little has been done to develop guidance for practice. With the exception of the protocol 'Informing Choice for Better Shelter' that delivers a guide for the development of technical educational material, there are no published tools nor guidelines that provide an implementation framework for self-recovery in shelter projects.This project addresses this gap. The protocol will be adapted to become a preparedness tool. A methodology for 'context analysis' will be designed to incorporate the adaptability and diversity essential to a self-recovery approach. Monitoring and evaluation tools will be developed that focus on survivor-led indicators and that include a broad definition of good shelter programming that includes health, livelihoods, sanitation, protection and gender-based violence as well as the conventional focus on structural safety and construction quality.The methodology will include field-work and case studies as well as action research, or real time research, that will directly support rapid-onset disaster responses contributing directly to development of strategies in the immediate aftermath of a disaster. All outputs will be thoroughly scrutinised by the humanitarian sector and incorporated directly into practice.

该项目直接建立在两个以前的GCRF奖项：1 NERC弹性基金会奖：促进更安全的建筑-使用科学，技术，通信和人道主义实践，以支持家庭和社区自我恢复。2英国城市和基础设施学院：更安全的自我恢复：促进灾后有复原力的城市重建。这两个项目的主要调查结果在业务案例中有所描述。欲了解更多关于以往GCRF奖项的发现，请参阅：https：//www.odi.org/publications/10963-self-recovery-disasters-international-perspective地震、风暴、洪水和冲突对基础设施、服务、农业和生计造成了无法估量的破坏。住房被毁往往是最明显的，对家庭的破坏也是最严重的，往往有数十万所房屋被毁。住户本身总是第一个作出反应;他们从来不是被动的，从灾害发生后的第一天起，住房恢复的迹象就非常明显。大多数国家-多达80%或90% -很少或根本没有得到国际社会的援助，它们是自己恢复进程的主要推动者。这个过程被称为“自我恢复”。以前的GCRF奖项支持由ODI领导的跨学科团队与CARE International UK，BGS，UCL和拉夫堡大学合作。他们加深了对自我恢复进程的理解，并将人道主义援助的理论基础推进到支持自我恢复的实践进程中。在很大程度上，由于这项工作，自我恢复现在已成为人道主义住房部门讨论的一个战略要素，许多救灾措施都声称支持这一不可避免的进程。为了表彰以人为本的方法的价值，摆脱了以公约产品为基础的模式，CARE菲律宾飓风后自我恢复项目赢得了2018年世界人居奖，以表彰其自我恢复的重点。建造了一万六千栋房屋，每栋房屋都是独一无二的，反映了每个家庭的优先事项和财力。https://www.world-habitat.org/world-habitat-awards/winners-and-finalists/post-haiyan-self-recovery-housing-programme/The自我恢复方法尊重机构和选择的首要地位，与当前的人道主义和发展问题非常一致，如“人道主义发展关系”，大谈判强调本地化，参与和基于现金的反应，仙台减少灾害风险框架，可持续发展目标和全球住房集群战略。这在商业案例中有进一步的解释。然而，在制定实践指南方面做得很少。除了为编写技术教育材料提供指南的“为更好的住房提供信息选择”议定书之外，没有公布的工具或准则为住房项目中的自我恢复提供执行框架。将对该议定书进行调整，使之成为一个备灾工具。将设计一种“背景分析”方法，以纳入自我恢复办法所必需的适应性和多样性。将制定监测和评价工具，重点放在幸存者主导的指标上，并包括良好住房规划的广泛定义，包括保健、生计、卫生、保护和基于性别的暴力以及传统的结构安全和建筑质量，方法将包括实地工作和个案研究以及行动研究，或真实的时间研究，这将直接支持迅速发生的灾害应对工作，直接有助于在灾害发生后立即制定战略。人道主义部门将对所有产出进行彻底审查，并将其直接纳入实践。