权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Marginalised Britain? Positions and Influence of UK Actors in EU Decision-Making

英国被边缘化？

基本信息

批准号：
ES/N000803/1
负责人：
Simon Hix
金额：
$ 9.14万
依托单位：
London School of Economics and Political Science
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Fellowship
财政年份：
2015
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2015 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FN000803%2F1
关键词：
Marginalised Britain Positions Influence UK

项目摘要

Lord Lawson, writing in the The Times in May 2013, argued that:"Not only do our interests increasingly differ from those of the eurozone members but, while never 'at the heart of Europe' ... we are now becoming increasingly marginalised as we are doomed to being consistently outvoted by the eurozone bloc" (Nigel Lawson, "I'll be Voting to Quit the EU", The Times, 7 May 2013)With the core project of the EU now deepening EMU and building political union alongside EMU, many share Lord Lawson's fear of UK marginalisation in this "new EU". For example, the defeat of the UK on the cap on bankers' bonuses is often cited as a case of "Eurozone caucusing" against British interests. Nevertheless, other analysts argue that now that the infrastructure for saving the Euro has been built, the EU is back to its core business of strengthening and reforming the single market. In this project, British actors - ministers, MEPs, and the new UK Commissioner - are part of the EU mainstream and perhaps even "leading from the front" in building support for reform and further liberalisation of the single market.So, the key question for the Fellowship is: has the UK become more or less marginalised in EU decision-making over the past 10 years?To answer this question I will look carefully at the empirical evidence relating to the positions and influence of UK "actors" in EU decision-making between 1 July 2004 and 31 December 2015. The project will look at the behaviour and influence of UK ministers in the Council, UK officials in COREPER, UK MEPs, and UK parties in the European Parliament. I will use my own existing research and data (on voting in the Council and European Parliament), and will supplement these with data from a large number of sources as well as existing research by other political scientists. The project aims to assess a number of issues, including: how often have UK actors been on the winning or losing side in the EU legislative process; whether the patterns of influence and power of UK actors, relative to the actors from other member states, have varied across policy issues; and whether there has been an emerging Eurozone (plus "pre-ins") caucus, in general or on specific policy issues (such as financial services, justice and home affairs etc.).The project will use a range of advanced analytical techniques, such as scaling of recorded votes in the Council and European Parliament to identify the "distances" between UK actors and the average members of the Council, the European Parliament, and the key political groups in the EP. The project will also look at several key legislative case studies of apparent UK "marginalisation", such as the cap on bankers' bonus, and will assess whether the patterns in these cases can be generalised.The results of the project will be disseminated through outputs aimed at policymakers, the media, opinion multipliers, and the wider public. The project will produce a major policy report summarising the key findings. During the project I will write 10 blog articles (one on each of the key elements of the project) on the LSE's EUROPP and the British Politics and Policy blogs, the ESRC's UK-EU website and will try to have several of these pieces syndicated on The Guardian blog (the LSE BPP blog has an on-going agreement with The Guardian). I will also promote the policy report and the blog pieces by social media, via my own Twitter account (with c.6,000 followers) as well as the LSE Government Department and VoteWatch accounts.The project will organise an off-the-record briefing for UK policy-makers, where the policy report will be presented and discussed. There will also be a high-profile public event at LSE: a public roundtable debate, where the key findings in the policy report will be presented and discussed with politicians and/or policy-makers from the main political parties in the UK as well as from several other EU member states.

劳森勋爵2013年5月在《泰晤士报》撰文指出：“不仅我们的利益与欧元区成员国的利益越来越不同，而且，尽管我们从未‘处于欧洲的核心’……（Nigel Lawson，“I'll vote to Quit the EU”，the Times， 2013年5月7日）随着欧盟的核心项目正在深化欧洲货币联盟，并与欧洲货币联盟一起建立政治联盟，许多人都像Lawson勋爵一样担心英国在这个“新欧盟”中被边缘化。例如，英国在银行家奖金上限问题上的失败，经常被视为不利于英国利益的“欧元区党团会议”。然而，其他分析人士认为，既然拯救欧元的基础设施已经建立起来，欧盟就要回到加强和改革单一市场的核心业务上来。在这个项目中，英国的参与者——部长、欧洲议会议员和新任英国专员——是欧盟主流的一部分，甚至可能“站在前线”，为改革和进一步开放单一市场争取支持。因此，该研究的关键问题是：在过去10年里，英国在欧盟决策中或多或少被边缘化了吗？为了回答这个问题，我将仔细研究与2004年7月1日至2015年12月31日期间英国“行动者”在欧盟决策中的立场和影响有关的经验证据。该项目将考察英国部长在理事会、英国官员在COREPER、英国议会议员和英国政党在欧洲议会的行为和影响力。我将使用我自己现有的研究和数据（关于理事会和欧洲议会的投票），并将从大量来源的数据以及其他政治学家的现有研究中补充这些数据。该项目旨在评估一系列问题，包括：在欧盟立法过程中，英国参与者在多大程度上处于输赢一方；相对于其他成员国的行为者，英国行为者的影响和权力模式在政策问题上是否有所不同；以及是否有一个新兴的欧元区（加上“pre-ins”）党团会议，无论是一般的还是具体的政策问题（如金融服务、司法和内政等）。该项目将使用一系列先进的分析技术，例如在理事会和欧洲议会中按比例记录投票，以确定英国行动者与理事会、欧洲议会和欧洲议会主要政治团体的平均成员之间的“距离”。该项目还将研究英国明显“边缘化”的几个关键立法案例，如银行家奖金上限，并将评估这些案例中的模式是否可以推广。该项目的成果将通过面向决策者、媒体、舆论倍增者和广大公众的产出加以传播。该项目将产生一份重要的政策报告，总结主要调查结果。在项目期间，我将在LSE的EUROPP和英国政治与政策博客、ESRC的英国-欧盟网站上撰写10篇博客文章（每一篇关于项目的关键要素），并尝试将其中的几篇文章联合发表在《卫报》的博客上（LSE BPP博客与《卫报》有持续的协议）。我还将通过社交媒体推广政策报告和博客文章，通过我自己的Twitter账户（拥有约6000名粉丝）以及伦敦政治经济学院政府部门和VoteWatch账户。该项目将为英国决策者组织一次非正式简报会，会上将介绍和讨论该政策报告。伦敦政治经济学院还将举办一场备受瞩目的公共活动：一场公开圆桌辩论，届时政策报告中的主要发现将与来自英国主要政党以及其他几个欧盟成员国的政治家和/或政策制定者进行讨论。