权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Measuring Political Debate: Responsiveness, Influence, and Rhetoric in Parliamentary Texts

衡量政治辩论：议会文本中的反应性、影响力和言辞

基本信息

批准号：
ES/N016297/1
负责人：
Jack Blumenau
金额：
$ 23.55万
依托单位：
London School of Economics and Political Science
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2016
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2016 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FN016297%2F1
关键词：
Measuring Political Debate Responsiveness Influence

项目摘要

Discussion and debate lie at the heart of democratic politics. When asked to think about politics in the UK, many people would recall images of the Prime Minister standing at the dispatch box, clashing with the Leader of the Opposition over topical issues. Similarly, many key events in the political calendar - the Budget, the Queen's Speech - revolve around large, high-profile debates on the floor of the Commons. However, aside from these limited cases, most parliamentary debates pass unnoticed by those outside of Westminster. This is unfortunate, as parliamentary speechmaking is a central democratic responsibility of elected politicians, and debates provide MPs with the opportunity to scrutinise government policy, and to voice the concerns and interests of their constituents.Political scientists have made a great deal of progress in analysing parliamentary debate in recent years, with significant attention devoted to using speeches to uncover underlying ideological preferences of MPs, or estimating the priorities that MPs place on different policy issues. However, while these features of political debate are important, when politicians speak, they are usually doing more than expressing their position on an ideological spectrum, or adding to the volume of words uttered on a given topic. Rather, politicians use speeches for a wide range of purposes: to influence the course of debate, to provide responses to questions, to persuade their audience of particular view point, and so on. This project moves beyond existing research by developing new ways to extract meaning from the speeches made by politicians. To do so, I will design new statistical methodologies for understanding three different features of political speech. In particular, I will develop methods to measure: 1) how responsive ministers are to questions put to them from backbench MPs,2) which politicians are influential in parliamentary debates, and 3) how MPs use rhetoric to make their speeches more persuasive.I will apply these new methods to the full collection of parliamentary debates from the beginning of Clement Attlee's government in 1945, to the end of the 2015 legislative session. Applying new measures to this large collection of political speeches will add depth to our understanding of the ways in which MPs deliberate over policy, and thus will provide new insights into the legislative process in the UK. Have ministers become less accountable to the legislature over time? Are different MPs influential in different policy areas? Has the style of parliamentary rhetoric changed in recent years? These are the questions that this project seeks to answer.More generally, the explosion of digitised political text online provides an excellent opportunity for us to better understand the ways in which our democratic representatives navigate the policymaking process. The methodologies developed in this project will contribute to a growing area of research that provides tools to capitalise on these new sources of data, with the aim of improving our knowledge of the behaviour of political actors. There is a strong appetite amongst the public and journalists for information about how MPs act and interact in parliament. As evidenced by popular websites like TheyWorkForYou.com and PublicWhip.org.uk, data resources and statistical summaries of MPs' behaviour play a key role in public oversight of political figures. This project will increase the ability of politically-engaged individuals to understand the legislative behaviour of members of parliament. In doing so, it will also provide new insights about what politicians say, and the motivations behind why they are saying it.

讨论和辩论是民主政治的核心。当被要求思考英国的政治时，许多人会回忆起首相站在收发箱前，与反对党领袖就热门问题发生冲突的画面。同样，政治日程上的许多关键事件--预算、女王演讲--都围绕着下议院的大型高调辩论。然而，除了这些有限的情况下，大多数议会辩论通过不被注意的那些以外的威斯敏斯特。这是不幸的，因为议会演讲是当选政治家的核心民主责任，辩论为议员提供了审查政府政策的机会，并表达其选民的关注和利益。近年来，政治学家在分析议会辩论方面取得了很大进展，他们非常关注利用演讲来揭示议员潜在的意识形态偏好，或者评估议员们在不同政策问题上的优先次序。然而，尽管政治辩论的这些特点很重要，但当政治家发言时，他们所做的通常不仅仅是表达他们在意识形态领域的立场，或者增加对特定主题的发言量。相反，政治家使用演讲的目的很广泛：影响辩论的进程，对问题做出回应，说服听众接受特定的观点，等等。本项目超越了现有的研究，开发了新的方法来从政治家的演讲中提取意义。为此，我将设计新的统计方法来理解政治演讲的三个不同特征。特别是，我将制定方法来衡量：1）部长们对后座议员向他们提出的问题的反应如何，2）哪些政治家在议会辩论中有影响力，3）议员们如何使用修辞使他们的演讲更具说服力。我将把这些新方法应用于从1945年克莱门特·艾德礼政府开始的议会辩论的全部收集，到2015年立法会议结束。将新的措施应用于这一大型政治演讲集，将加深我们对议员审议政策方式的理解，从而为英国的立法过程提供新的见解。随着时间的推移，部长们对立法机构的责任是否越来越少？不同的议员在不同的政策领域有影响力吗？近年来，议会的言论风格有没有改变？这些都是这个项目试图回答的问题。更广泛地说，在线数字化政治文本的爆炸式增长为我们提供了一个绝佳的机会，让我们更好地了解我们的民主代表在决策过程中的导航方式。在这个项目中开发的方法将有助于一个不断增长的研究领域，提供利用这些新的数据来源的工具，目的是提高我们对政治行为体行为的了解。公众和记者对有关议员如何在议会中行事和互动的信息有着强烈的兴趣。正如TheyWorkForYou.com和PublicWhip.org.uk等热门网站所证明的那样，议员行为的数据资源和统计摘要在公众监督政治人物方面发挥着关键作用。该项目将提高参与政治的个人了解议员立法行为的能力。在这样做的过程中，它还将提供关于政治家所说的话以及他们为什么这么说背后的动机的新见解。