Investigating the Dynamic Response of the Greenland Ice Sheet to Climate Forcing using a Geophysical, Remote-Sensing and Numerical Modelling Framework

使用地球物理、遥感和数值模拟框架研究格陵兰冰盖对气候强迫的动态响应

• 批准号: NE/G005796/1
• 负责人: Alun Hubbard
• 金额: $ 33.32万
• 依托单位: Aberystwyth University
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2009
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2009 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=NE%2FG005796%2F1
• 关键词: Investigating; Dynamic; Response; Greenland; Ice

An increasing number of scientific studies show that human activities, e.g. burning of fossil fuels, have increased the concentration of heat-trapping gasses in the atmosphere. It is estimated that global temperatures will increase by 2-5 degrees C during this century if we continue to add carbon dioxide and other 'greenhouse' gasses to the atmosphere. In the Arctic, warming is expected to be even faster and mean annual temperature may increase by 4-7 degrees C. The implications of global warming are of immense proportions because glaciers and ice sheets will melt faster and become increasingly prone to collapse. In Greenland, discharge from outlet glaciers is responsible for about half the annual loss of ice. The other lost half is due to runoff of surface meltwater. The combined effect of iceberg discharge and surface melt are currently greater than the total amount of snowfall falling onto the Greenland Ice Sheet. This ice sheet is therefore shrinking while releasing freshwater into the Atlantic Ocean. The imbalance amounted to -90 cubic km per year for 1996 and increased to -140 cubic km per year by 2000. In 2005, this imbalance may have increased to as much as -220 cubic km per year. The size of the Greenland Ice Sheet is thus diminishing at what appears to be a growing rate. Worldwide concern is associated with this trend because ice-sheet decay results in global sea-level rise and possibly even an obstruction of oceanic circulation, which in key places - such as the North Atlantic - is sensitive to freshwater released from melting ice masses. The Greenland Ice Sheet rests on bedrock above or close to sea level. Glaciologists have for years assumed that such position would be stable and that demise of the ice sheet would require thousands of years even under extreme global warming scenarios. This assumption may need revision. It was shown recently that surface meltwater could penetrate through over 1km of ice to the base of the Greenland Ice Sheet and cause ice-flow speed-up due to faster basal sliding. This mechanism is potentially dangerous because accelerated ice flow leads to thinning, which in turn leads to an increase in surface melt since a larger part of the ice sheet moves into lower and warmer elevations. The Greenland Ice Sheet may therefore be far more prone to decay than it was assumed in earlier projections of global warming. However, up until now the mechanisms by which this dynamic response between surface melt and ice flow have only been generally understood and the present generation of climate-ice sheet models which are used to forecast future sea-level change do not include them in any rigorous manner. This is particularly true in respect of: 1) the extent to which the surface, interior and basal water-plumbing and ice flow systems can moderate, amplify and transmit the dynamic response away into the interior of the ice sheet thereby drawing the inland ice reservoir down and, 2) the extent to which future changes in Greenland temperatures may increase both the area and length of time of which the ice sheet directly experiences these effects. This project directly addresses both of these shortcomings in current models and will implement a set of fieldwork, satellite remote-sensing and comprehensive Greenland Ice Sheet modelling simulations that will fully assess and implement those 'dynamical processes related to ice flow not included in current models... (which) could increase the vulnerability of the ice sheets to warming, increasing future sea-level rise.' (IPCC, WG1 - 2007).

越来越多的科学研究表明，人类活动，例如燃烧化石燃料，增加了大气中吸热气体的浓度。据估计，如果我们继续向大气中增加二氧化碳和其他“温室”气体，全球气温将在本世纪上升2-5摄氏度。在北极，预计变暖速度将更快，年平均气温可能上升4-7摄氏度。全球变暖的影响是巨大的，因为冰川和冰盖将融化得更快，越来越容易崩溃。在格陵兰，冰川出口的排放量占每年冰损失量的一半左右。另一半损失是由于地表融水的径流。目前，冰山泄流和表面融化的综合影响大于格陵兰冰盖上的降雪总量。因此，冰盖正在缩小，同时向大西洋释放淡水。1996年的不平衡为每年-90立方公里，到2000年增加到每年-140立方公里。2005年，这种不平衡可能增加到每年-220立方公里。因此，格陵兰冰盖的大小正在以似乎是增长的速度减少。这一趋势引起了全世界的关注，因为冰盖的衰减导致全球海平面上升，甚至可能阻碍海洋环流，而在北大西洋等关键地区，海洋环流对融化的冰块释放的淡水很敏感。格陵兰冰盖位于海平面以上或接近海平面的基岩上。多年来，冰川学家一直认为这样的位置是稳定的，即使在极端的全球变暖情况下，冰盖的消亡也需要数千年。这一假设可能需要修订。最近的研究表明，地表融水可以穿透超过1公里的冰层到达格陵兰冰盖的底部，并由于更快的底部滑动而导致冰流加速。这种机制具有潜在的危险性，因为加速的冰流导致变薄，这反过来又导致表面融化的增加，因为大部分冰盖移动到较低和较温暖的海拔。因此，格陵兰冰盖可能比早期对全球变暖的预测更容易腐烂。然而，到目前为止，这种表面融化和冰流之间的动态响应的机制只得到了普遍的理解，目前这一代用于预测未来海平面变化的气候冰盖模型并没有以任何严格的方式包括它们。在以下方面尤其如此：1）表面、内部和基底水管和冰流系统能够缓和、放大和将动态响应传递到冰盖内部从而将内陆冰库向下拉的程度，（二）格陵兰岛未来气温变化的程度可能会增加冰盖直接经历的面积和时间长度这些影响。该项目直接解决了当前模型中的这两个缺点，并将实施一系列实地工作，卫星遥感和全面的格陵兰冰盖建模模拟，以充分评估和实施与当前模型中不包括的冰流有关的动态过程。（这）可能会增加冰盖对变暖的脆弱性，增加未来海平面上升。（IPCC，WG1 - 2007）。

项目成果

Cascading lake drainage on the Greenland Ice Sheet triggered by tensile shock and fracture.

• DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03420-8
• 发表时间: 2018-03-14
• 期刊: Nature communications
• 影响因子: 16.6
• 作者: Christoffersen P;Bougamont M;Hubbard A;Doyle SH;Grigsby S;Pettersson R
• 通讯作者: Pettersson R

Changing surface-atmosphere energy exchange and refreezing capacity of the lower accumulation area, West Greenland

西格陵兰低积累区地表-大气能量交换和再冻结能力的变化

• DOI: 10.5194/tc-9-2163-2015
• 发表时间: 2015
• 期刊: The Cryosphere
• 作者: Charalampidis C

Glacier algae accelerate melt rates on the western Greenland Ice Sheet

• DOI: 10.5194/tc-2019-58
• 发表时间: 2019-04
• 作者: J. Cook;A. Tedstone;C. Williamson;J. McCutcheon;A. Hodson;A. Dayal;M. Skiles;Stefan Hofer

Rapid development and persistence of efficient subglacial drainage under 900 m-thick ice in Greenland

格陵兰岛900米厚冰层下有效冰下排水的快速发展和持续

• DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2021.116982
• 发表时间: 2021
• 期刊: Earth and Planetary Science Letters
• 影响因子: 5.3
• 作者: Chandler D

Seasonal velocities of eight major marine-terminating outlet glaciers of the Greenland ice sheet from continuous in situ GPS instruments

来自连续原位 GPS 仪器的格陵兰冰盖八个主要海洋终止出口冰川的季节速度

• DOI: 10.5194/essdd-6-27-2013
• 发表时间: 2013
• 作者: Ahlstrøm A