Uniform Naturalistic Teenage Driving Data Set

一个数据缺口是缺乏有关青少年新手驾驶风险的信息。机动车碰撞是青少年受伤和死亡的主要原因。自然主义青少年驾驶研究（NTDS）产生了关于青少年驾驶风险的新的重要信息，包括与碰撞和接近碰撞以及危险驾驶相关的因素（Simons-Morton等人，20 lla）; NTDS使用安装在研究参与者车辆中的数据记录设备对危险驾驶进行客观测量，证实了新手青少年驾驶员相对于成年人的事故率较高。具体而言，新手青少年司机的碰撞/近碰撞（CNC）率几乎是四倍，运动学风险驾驶率几乎是五倍（例如，升高的重力事件发生率）（父母驾驶相同的车辆（Simons-Morton等人，2011年b）。此外，我们发现，青少年司机在从事次要任务（如拨打电话、发短信、吃饭和伸手拿东西）时，CNC的可能性明显更高（Klauer等人，审查中）。然而，NTDS是基于42名青少年和54名成年人的小样本，因此需要用更大的样本重复和确认分析。例如，显示每月运动学危险驾驶率预测CNC的可能性的分析在随后的月份是通常在随后的分析中用更大和更多样化的样本验证的类型（Simons-Morton等人，2012年）。此外，以前的分析是有限的，因为NTDS青少年司机暴露于某些驾驶条件，如雨，高速公路，和青少年乘客，太有限的稳定分析，但可以做一个更大的样本。另外两个自然主义的研究已经进行了与青少年驾驶员样本基于相同的技术作为NTDS，加速度计，GPS和摄像头，提供有关升高的g力事件率，CNC率，次要任务参与和超速的信息，第一个是NICHD资助的监督实践驾驶研究（SPDS），评估了82名青少年和112名成年驾驶员的样本。第二个是战略公路研究计划2（SHRP 2）研究，由运输研究委员会（TRB）赞助。SHRP 2评估了美国四个地理区域的驾驶员样本，包括<200 16-17，18-20，21-25和35-45奥尔兹。SHRP 2的数据是公开的，并提供了一个前所未有的机会来检查青少年司机碰撞风险。鉴于NTDS的生产力和从中获得的经验，PRB的研究人员处于独特的地位，可以通过结合这三个数据来源（NTDS，SPDS，SHRP 2）来利用现有的自然驾驶数据，以创建一个约324名青少年和374名成年驾驶员的数据集，从而对青少年驾驶风险进行明确的分析

One data gap is the lack of information about novice teenage driving risk. Motor vehicle crashes are a leading cause of injury and death among adolescents. The Naturalistic Teenage Driving Study (NTDS) yielded new and important information about teenage driving risk, including factors associated with crash and near crashes and risky driving (Simons-Morton et al., 20lla); Using objective measures of risky driving from data recording devices installed in study participants' vehicles, NTDS confirmed novice teen drivers' elevated crash rates, relative to adults. Specifically, novice teenage drivers have nearly four times the crash/near crash (CNC) rates and nearly five times higher rates of kinematic risky driving (e.g., elevated gravitational force event rates) of adults (parents driving the same vehicles (Simons-Morton et al., 2011b). Also, we found that the likelihood of a CNC was significantly higher for teenage drivers when engaging in secondary tasks such as telephone dialing, texting, eating, and reaching for objects (Klauer et al., under review). However, the NTDS was based on a small sample of 42 teens and 54 adults, hence there is a need to replicate and confirm analyses with larger samples. For example, analyses showing that monthly kinematic risky driving rates predict the likelihood of a CNC In the subsequent month are the sort that are typically verified in subsequent analyses with larger and more diverse samples (Simons-Morton et al., 2012). Also, previous analyses were limited because NTDS teenage driver exposure to certain driving conditions, for example, rain, highways, and teenage passengers, were too limited for stable analyses, but could be done with a larger sample. Two additional naturalistic studies have been conducted with teenage driver samples based on the same technology as the NTDS, with accelerometers, GPS, and cameras, which provide information about elevated g-force event rates, CNC rates, secondary task engagement, and speeding, The first is the NICHD-funded Supervised Practice Driving Study (SPDS) that assessed a sample of 82 teenage and 112 adult drivers. The second Is the Strategic Highway Research Program 2 (SHRP2) study, sponsored by the Transportation Research Board (TRB). SHRP2 assessed samples of drivers in four geographic regions of the US, including <200 16-17, 18-20, 21-25, and 35-45 year olds. The SHRP2 data are publicly available, and provide an unprecedented opportunity to examine teenage driver crash risk. Given the productivity of the NTDS and the experience gained from it, PRB researchers are uniquely positioned to leverage the available naturalistic driving data by combining these three sources of data (NTDS, SPDS, SHRP2) to create a dataset of approximately 324 teenage and 374 adult drivers that would enable definitive analysis of teenage driving risk