课题基金 / 基金详情

项目摘要

项目成果

Donald John Krogstad的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
说明(申请人提供):在发达国家,知情同意程序主要取决于当地机构审查委员会(IRBs)批准的文件和参与者的签名,以表明他们已阅读和理解该文件。知情同意的两个基本目标是:第一,确保参与者充分和公平地知情;第二,确保自愿给予同意。不幸的是,知情同意程序在发展中国家往往无法实现这些目标,因为参与者的识字能力有限或根本没有识字能力,对西医的经验也有限。这项提案的目标是制定知情同意策略,对发展中国家识字率有限或没有西医经验的人和美国受过教育的人一样有效。这个问题与最广泛意义上的健康研究有关,因为在美国(新奥尔良、休斯顿、纽约、洛杉矶)也存在识字率有限、西医经验有限的人。这项建议的具体目的是:1)制定战略,评估潜在参与者对研究方案的理解和他们对知情同意程序的接受程度;2)使用这些策略,根据参与者收到的信息(与巴马科语言研究所合作准备的录像带演示与研究方案的传统意译译文)比较参与者的理解,并比较对新同意程序(基于与研究代表和有录像记录的马里传统中间人的讨论的口头同意)和传统同意(基于“签署,在参与者无法阅读的文档上放置“X”或缩略图)。如果成功,这项建议将允许在其他海外和国内网站制定类似的战略--基于关键线人访谈和重点小组,以确保所选择的战略与当地的文化信仰和模式一致。因此,这种方法在市中心的环境中也有潜在的价值,在那里,识字能力和西医经验有限的情况很常见。这种做法摆脱了目前对书面文件的依赖,提供了一个重新关注知情同意的基本要素的机会:让参与者得到充分和公平的信息,并自由地给予同意。与公共卫生相关因为知情同意依赖于书面文件,它常常因为发展中国家的文盲而失败。该建议使用录像带以方言直观地呈现研究方案,并使用摄像机记录受试者、研究代表和传统马里中间人之间的同意交易的新同意程序。然后,它比较了录像带介绍与传统介绍(工作人员对研究方案的转译)的有效性,以及接受新同意程序与接受传统同意程序(在同意文件上打上“X”或指纹)的效果。
英文摘要
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): In developed countries, the informed consent process depends primarily on documents approved by local Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and on the participants' signatures, to indicate they have read and understood the document. The two essential goals of informed consent are first, to ensure that participants are fully and fairly informed, and second, to ensure that consent is given freely. Unfortunately, the informed consent process often fails to achieve these goals in developing countries because the participants have limited or no literacy and limited experience with western medicine. The goal of this proposal is to develop informed consent strategies which are as effective for persons in developing countries with limited or no literacy (who have limited experience with western medicine) as they are for educated individuals in the U.S. This issue is relevant to health research in the broadest sense, because individuals with limited literacy who have limited experience with western medicine are also present in the U.S. (New Orleans, Houston, New York, Los Angeles). The specific aims of this proposal are to: 1] develop strategies to assess the understanding of a study protocol by potential participants and their acceptance of the informed consent process, and 2] use those strategies to compare the understanding of participants based on the information they have received (videotape presentation prepared in collaboration with the Institute of Languages in Bamako vs. the conventional paraphrased translation of the study protocol) and to compare the acceptance of a new consent procedure (oral consent based on discussion with a study representative and a traditional Malian intermediary that is documented with a video recorder) to the conventional consent (based on "signing," placing an "X" or a thumbprint on a document the participant cannot read). If successful, this proposal will permit the development of similar strategies at other overseas and domestic sites - based on key informant interviews and focus groups to ensure that the strategies selected are consistent with local cultural beliefs and patterns. Thus, this approach also has the potential to be valuable in inner city environments where limited literacy and limited experience with western medicine are common. By departing from the current reliance on written documentation, this approach offers an opportunity to refocus on the essential elements of informed consent: that the participants be fully and fairly informed, and that consent be given freely. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE Because informed consent depends on written documents, it often fails because of illiteracy in developing countries. This proposal uses a videotape to present the study protocol visually and in dialect, and a new consent procedure based on recording the consent transaction between the subject, study representative and traditional Malian intermediary with a video camera. It then compares the effectiveness of the videotape presentation to the conventional presentation (paraphrased translation of the study protocol by a staff member) and the acceptance of the new consent procedure to the acceptance of the conventional consent procedure (placing an "X" or a thumbprint on the consent document).
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Population-based Approach to Malaria Research and Control
  • 批准号:
    7946588
  • 项目类别:
  • 资助金额:
    $140.41万
  • 财政年份:
    2010
  • 负责人:
    Donald John Krogstad
  • 依托单位:
Administrative Core
  • 批准号:
    8009129
  • 项目类别:
  • 资助金额:
    $22.9万
  • 财政年份:
    2010
  • 负责人:
    Donald John Krogstad
  • 依托单位:
Population-based Approach to Malaria Research and Control
  • 批准号:
    9099694
  • 项目类别:
  • 资助金额:
    $168.94万
  • 财政年份:
    2010
  • 负责人:
    Donald John Krogstad
  • 依托单位:
Population-based Approach to Malaria Research and Control
  • 批准号:
    8508664
  • 项目类别:
  • 资助金额:
    $148.93万
  • 财政年份:
    2010
  • 负责人:
    Donald John Krogstad
  • 依托单位:
海外基金