Systematic and Structural Methods for Post-Silicon Validation

用于硅后验证的系统性和结构性方法

• 批准号: RGPIN-2015-05312
• 负责人: Nicolici, Nicola
• 金额: $ 2.7万
• 依托单位: McMaster University
• 依托单位国家: 加拿大
• 项目类别: Discovery Grants Program - Individual
• 财政年份: 2018
• 资助国家: 加拿大
• 起止时间: 2018-01-01 至 2019-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/ase-oro/Details-Detailles_eng.asp?id=660931
• 关键词: Systematic; Structural; Methods; Post; Silicon

The difficulty of guaranteeing that electronic circuits and systems meet the stated or implied goals has been continuously increasing over the past decade. This is mainly due to the exponential dependence of the state space on the growing number of state elements, as well as the excessively large number of clock and power domains needed to facilitate performance improvements under power and energy constraints. Pre-silicon verification is commonly employed to ensure the consistency between the design and its specification. Before tapeout what can be measured is limited by the simulation time and accuracy, and designs are released for manufacturing when the confidence level is deemed sufficient. Manufacturing test is focused on screening for physical defects in each fabricated device; considering that its reference is the design implementation, manufacturing test is not concerned with finding and identifying subtle design errors (or bugs) that have escaped to silicon prototypes. Thus the verification tasks employed during the pre-silicon phase continue on these early silicon prototypes, a term commonly referred to as post-silicon validation.***Because simulation is 6 to 9 orders of magnitude slower than the actual silicon prototype, it is not practically possible to compute golden responses a-priori. Together with the lack of internal node access, this makes post-silicon validation an intractable problem. Furthermore, state-of-the-art circuits and systems might fail in one experiment and operate correctly in the subsequent ones. This is because subtle design errors that escape to the silicon prototypes are often excited by not-easily-repeatable events. For example, they can be triggered by rare interactions caused by asynchronous interfaces and/or dynamic changes in the circuit's operating mode, e.g., for trading-off power vs performance in response to varying workload or environmental conditions. Considering the above, investigating new systematic approaches that can assist the post-silicon validation tasks can bring significant benefits to the broader electronics industry, in terms of both productivity gains and, more importantly, the quality of the final product.***As part of this research program, we aim to investigate automated methods for all the key building blocks of a general-purpose post-silicon validation system: trace collection and analysis, event detection, post-silicon stimuli generation and application, and coverage measurement. All of the above will rely on the design structure rather than its functionality. It is our position that a structural approach will provide the much-needed theoretical foundations, which will facilitate seamless portability of automated methods across the semiconductor industry, as well as scalability to the next-generation of integrated circuits which are expected to aggressively trade off power vs performance at run-time. **

在过去的十年中，保证电子电路和系统满足所述或隐含的目标的难度一直在不断增加。这主要是由于状态空间对不断增长的状态元素数量的指数依赖性，以及在功率和能量约束下促进性能改进所需的过多数量的时钟和功率域。预硅验证通常用于确保设计与其规格之间的一致性。在流片之前，可以测量的内容受到模拟时间和精度的限制，当置信水平被认为足够时，设计被发布用于制造。制造测试的重点是筛选每个制造设备中的物理缺陷;考虑到其参考是设计实现，制造测试不关心发现和识别已经逃逸到硅原型的细微设计错误（或缺陷）。因此，在硅化前阶段采用的验证任务继续在这些早期的硅原型上进行，这一术语通常称为硅化后验证。因为模拟比实际硅原型慢6到9个数量级，所以实际上不可能先验地计算黄金响应。加上缺乏内部节点访问，这使得后硅验证成为一个棘手的问题。此外，最先进的电路和系统可能在一个实验中失败，并在随后的实验中正确运行。这是因为逃逸到硅原型中的细微设计错误通常会被不容易重复的事件所激发。例如，它们可以由异步接口和/或电路操作模式的动态变化引起的罕见交互触发，例如，用于响应于变化的工作负载或环境条件来权衡功率与性能。考虑到上述情况，研究可以帮助后硅验证任务的新系统方法可以为更广泛的电子行业带来显着的好处，无论是生产率的提高，还是更重要的是最终产品的质量。作为这项研究计划的一部分，我们的目标是研究通用硅后验证系统的所有关键构建模块的自动化方法：跟踪收集和分析，事件检测，硅后刺激生成和应用，以及覆盖测量。所有这些都将依赖于设计结构而不是其功能。我们的立场是，结构化方法将提供急需的理论基础，这将促进整个半导体行业的自动化方法的无缝可移植性，以及可扩展到下一代集成电路，预计将在运行时积极权衡功耗与性能。**