The Strategic Impact of Information on Firms and Markets: The Case of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990

Moorman摘要 “信息对企业和市场的战略影响：1990年营养标签和教育法案的案例。 本研究计划探讨信息在企业行为和市场动态中的影响，并解决信息流超出单个企业的情况，以获得有关行业中大多数企业的信息。 信息的流动可能是由于公司的主动竞争行动，也可能是由于管理机构或消费者团体的行动。 例如，可以取消管制，将大量信息释放到市场中，或者管制可以要求公司披露信息。 这些外部信息流被称为市场信息。 在这项研究中，研究市场信息影响的背景是由国会于1990年通过并于1994年实施的《营养标签和教育法案》（NLEA）所产生的信息涌入。 NLEA迫使食品制造商使用标准格式传达营养信息，称为“营养成分”标签。 所有的研究项目都采用了纵向准实验设计，并进行了适当的控制。 这项补助金调查了几个研究问题。 第一个问题是审查市场信息对产品质量措施的影响。 该提案通过审查更复杂的、多属性的产品质量衡量方法（例如，口味和营养），以及评估对市场效率的影响和公司之间竞争的性质。 研究将探讨企业资源和能力对产品质量变化的水平和时间的影响。 如果发现企业差异会导致企业对市场信息的反应差异，那么研究将调查市场信息对食品工业结构和动态的影响。 本研究计划的最后一个组成部分是收集额外的数据，以检查市场信息相对于控制条件的影响。 通过利用历史数据、非食品数据和国际数据，本研究提案为确定信息对市场动态的影响提供了坚实的基础。 在影响方面，本研究试图通过利用跨学科的方法来发展研究问题和相关假设来增强现有的理论。 这种方法为每个研究主题产生了几个反直觉的预测，传播这些结果的文章将针对营销，战略管理，经济学和公共政策等学科。 除了理论上的影响，这项建议还试图影响政策设计。 具体而言，通过证明消费者行为、管理决策、企业层面的反应和产业层面的影响与经济学理论的直接推断不同，监管者将更好地理解各种政策设计选择的含义。

Moorman Abstract `The Strategic Impact of Information on Firms and Markets: The Case of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990.` This research proposal examines the impact of information in firm behavior and market dynamics and addresses situations in which the flow of information goes beyond in a single firm to where information is available regarding most firms in an industry. The flow of information might result from proactive competitive moves by firms or from the actions of regulatory bodies or consumer groups.. For example, regulations may be removed and free the floe of information into markets or regulations may require the disclosure of information by firms. These external information flows are termed market information. The context for examining the impact of market information in this research is the influx of information created by the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) passed by Congress in 1990 and implemented in 1994. The NLEA forced food manufacturers to communicate nutrition information using a standardized format referred to as the `Nutrition Facts` label. All of the projects investigated in this grant utilized a longitudinal quasi-experimental design with appropriate controls. This grant investigates several research issues. The first issue is to examine the impact of market information on product quality measures. This proposal extends initial work in this area by examining more complex, multi-attribute approaches to the measurement of product quality (e.g., taste and nutrition) and by assessing the impact on market efficiency and the nature of competitive rivalry among firms. The research will then examine the impact of firm resources and capabilities on the level and timing of product quality changes. If firm differences are found to produce differences in firm responses to market information, research will then investigate the impact of market information on the structure and dynamics of the food industry. A final component of this research program is to collect additional data to examine the impact of market information relative to control conditions. By utilizing historical data, non-food data, and international data, this research proposal provides a solid basis for establishing the impact of information on market dynamics. In terms of implications, this research seeks to augment existing theories by utilizing and interdisciplinary approach to the development of research questions and associated hypotheses. This approach produces several counter-intuitive predictions for each research topic and articles disseminating these results will be targeted across disciplines in marketing, strategic management, economics, and public policy. In addition to theoretical impact, this proposal also seeks to influence policy design. Specifically, by demonstrating that consumer behavior, managerial decision-making, firm-level responses, and industry-level effects are different from what might be expected from straight extrapolations of economics theories, regulators will have a better understanding of implications of various policy design choices.