Collaborative Research: Conference: SaTC: CORE: 2.0 Vision Proposal

在过去的十年中，NSF安全与可信网络空间（SaTC）计划为创新研究、教育和向实践项目的过渡提供了稳定的支持。然而，随着物联网、人工智能、社交媒体、量子计算等后疫情时代的发展，网络安全研究前沿不断向前发展，需要重新思考未来的发展方向。以及NSF SaTC项目的新投资策略和投资重点。本提案概述了SaTC 2.0战略规划活动的背景、结构和时间表，以及SaTC 2.0愿景文件的开发。这项工作将从预先规划和资料收集活动开始，然后是一个为期数天的工作讲习班。研讨会的成果将是对未来网络安全研究（未来10年）的建议和想法的集合。SaTC v2研讨会和愿景文件将帮助NSF通过加强学术界、工业界、政府之间的伙伴关系和合作来改进其旗舰网络安全研究计划，并实现NSF的长期目标，即增加多样性，改善传统上未被充分代表的社会个体的福祉，改善国家安全和增强我们国家的竞争力，并为研究和教育建立更好的基础设施。该奖项反映了美国国家科学基金会的法定使命，并通过使用基金会的知识价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估，被认为值得支持。

NSF SaTC (Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace) program has provided a steady support of innovative research, education, and transition to practice projects over the past decade. However, the cyber security research front has continuously moved forward with recent developments in internet of things, artificial intelligence, social media, quantum computing in a post-covid world, requiring a rethinking of future directions. and a new investment strategy and investment priorities of the NSF SaTC program. This proposal outlines the background, structure, and timeline for the SaTC 2.0 strategic planning activity, as well as the development of a SaTC 2.0 vision document. The effort will begin with pre-planning and information gathering activities, followed by a multi-day, working workshop. The outcomes from the workshop will be a collection of recommendations and ideas for the future of cybersecurity research (over the next 10 years). The SaTC v2 workshop and the vision document will help NSF to revamp its flagship cyber security research program through increased partnerships and collaboration among academia, industry, government, and to achieve NSF’s long-term goal of increasing diversity to improve the well-being of traditionally underrepresented individuals in society, improving national security and enhancing our nation’s competitiveness, and building a better infrastructure for research and education.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.