Virgilius Maro Grammaticus - was he a grammarian?

该项目的目的是研究在多大程度上的Hiberno-Latin语法学家Mariilius Maro，谁写的c现存的作品。650 CE，应该被理解为在晚期古代语法理论的背景和传统中的严肃出版物，作为对这一学科的模仿，作为隐藏的寓言，或者仅仅是胡说八道。虽然后来的语法学家，植根于古老的传统，（如所谓的多纳图斯Ortigraphus）作为一个理所当然的问题引用语法学家Albertilius作为一个专家来源，现代学者已经困惑的“实际”和“真正”的意图，作者为c。150年在这一过程中，古里留斯又以一个愚蠢的爱开玩笑的人、一个博学的戏仿者，甚至是一个（原始卡巴拉）智慧的老师的身份出现。文本本身似乎是足够的安全（有两个现代的关键版本），但到今天的评论是缺乏。也没有一个连贯的专题研究，提出了工作的中心方面;到目前为止，唯一的贡献是具体的，部分是有倾向性的。为了给有充分根据的回答上述问题的两个现存的作品，所谓的Epitomae和Epistolae，将审查参考古代语法有关的形式和内容：首先，对《书信集》中的八个篇章进行了深入的分析，其中涵盖了传统的八个词类（名词，代词，动词，形容词，分词，连词，介词和感叹词），将回答这个问题有多熟悉古语法及其问题，他可能在其中加入了补充、批评甚至戏仿。在此之后，而散文摘要，这是相当多的部分更模糊，将阐明在一个主要内容相关的评论，以解决问题，是否有严重的语法（或其他？）这些问题往往隐藏在看似虚构和/或荒谬的细节背后。研究结果将被总结在第一个科学的整体介绍的Maro，侧重于语法的历史。

The objective of the project is to examine to what extent the extant works of the Hiberno-Latin grammarian Virgilius Maro, who wrote c. 650 CE, should be understood as serious publications in the context and tradition of late antique grammatical theory, as parodies of this discipline, as hidden allegories, or as mere nonsense. While subsequent grammarians, rooted in ancient tradition, (such as the so-called Donatus Ortigraphus) as a matter of course quote the grammarian Virgilius as an expert source, modern scholars have puzzled over the "actual" and "true" intentions of the author for c. 150 years. In this process Virgilius in turn appears as a silly jokester, an erudite parodist, or even as a (proto-Kabbalistic) teacher of wisdom. The text itself seems to be sufficiently secure (there are two modern critical editions), but to this day a commentary is lacking. Neither is there a coherent monographic study which presents the central aspects of the work; so far, the only contributions are specific and, in part, tendentious. In order to give well-grounded answers to the questions outlined above the two extant works, the so-called Epitomae and Epistolae, will be examined for references to ancient grammar regarding form and content: first, a thorough analysis of the eight Epistolae, which cover the traditional eight parts of speech (noun, pronoun, verb, adjective, participle, conjunction, preposition, and interjection), will answer the question how familiar Virgilius was with ancient grammar and its problems, and where he possibly included additions, criticism or even parody. Following this, the rather essayistic Epitomae, which are in part considerably more obscure, will be elucidated in a mainly content-related commentary so as to resolve the question whether there are serious grammatical (or other?) issues hidden behind the often, as it seems, fictitious and/or nonsensical details. The results will be summarized in the first scientific overall presentation of Virgilius Maro, focusing on the history of grammar.