The relation between disciplinary concepts of originality and practical orientations for data sharing

该项目偏离了这样一种假设，即科学原创性的概念与数据共享的实际方向之间存在联系，这是由对科学声誉的渴望构成的。关于科学原创性的研究表明，授予科学声誉取决于所产生的科学知识是否被承认为原创。这种联系尚未得到分析或证实，然而，这一假设得到了一些指标的支持：例如，研究人员指出，他们不分享数据的主要原因是，这种做法不会得到科学声誉的奖励。此外，研究人员表示，他们不会传递数据，直到这些资源不能再用于好的出版物，这意味着提高他们的科学声誉。另一方面，如果这一天赋增加了产生原创科学知识的前景，数据就会共享。正如自己的实证研究显示的那样，原创性的概念根据学科的具体特点而有所不同。这可能是在数据共享方面存在学科差异的一个重要原因。

The project departs from the assumption that a link between the concepts of scientific originality and the practical orientations for data sharing exists, which is constituted by the aspiration for scientific reputation. Studies on scientific originality have shown that the awarding of scientific reputation depends on, that the generated scientific knowledge is recognized as original. This link has neither been analyzed nor proven yet, however, this assumption is supported by some indicators: for instance researchers name as main reason why they do not share their data, that this practice would not be rewarded with scientific reputation. Moreover researchers state that they would not pass the data until this resource cannot be longer used for good publications, that means for increasing their scientific reputation. On the other hand data is shared if this gift increases the prospects for generating original scientific knowledge. The concepts of originality differ according to discipline-specific characteristics, as own empirical studies show. These could be an important reason for the disciplinary differences regarding data sharing.