Vernunft und Glaube bei Kant

康德的《纯粹理性批判》否认“知识”是为了“给信仰留出空间”。但是这个房间要怎么塑造呢？根据康德的说法，通过一种“理性的信念”，这种信念只能从实践的观点来陈述某些理论命题的真理，而对于理性的理论应用，这些命题必须保持未确定。本文通过阐释康德对信仰与理性关系的确定与“纯粹理性的架构”的关系，对康德对信仰与理性关系的确定进行了深入的分析。在这种背景下，康德关于基本神学的中心结论与他关于教条主义的主要决定一起发展，后者特别关注康德的《纯粹理性边界内的宗教》。该研究质疑康德对罪、恩典和称义之间关系的确定，以及他关于基督论、教会论和末世论的立场是否必须被视为没有任何选择。此外，本文还在康德的方法中寻找方法论问题，并探讨这些问题对今天的系统神学的意义。

Kant’s (Critique of Pure Reason denies “knowledge” in order to make “room for faith". But how is this room to be shaped? According to Kant, by a “rational belief which states the truth of some theoretical propositions only from a “practical point of view, while for the theoretical use of reason these propositions have to remain undecided. The study subjects Kant’s determination of relationship of faith and reason to a thorough analysis by explicating its relationship to the “Architectonic of Pure Reason”. In this context, Kant's central conclusions on fundamental theology are developed alongside his main decisions on dogmatics, with the latter paying special regard to Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. The study calls into question whether Kant's determination of the relationship between sin, grace and justification as well as his positions concerning Christology, ecclesiology and eschatology have to be regarded as being without any alternative. Furthermore, it seeks methodological problems in Kant's approach and searches for the significance of these for systematic theology today.