Contested Politics of the New Justice

恢复性司法（RJ）和土著司法（IJ）通过强调非正式程序和基于社区的决定，正在改变对犯罪的反应。随着增长，关于这些新司法形式的潜在好处和缺陷的争论也随之而来。该项目分析了澳大利亚、新西兰和加拿大在两个方面的证据：女权主义者和受害者倡导团体之间关于使用RJ实施性暴力和身体暴力的辩论，以及土著和非土著人民之间关于IJ优点的辩论。这个项目将展示什么时候RJ是合适的，什么样的IJ实践是有意义的，以及女权主义和土著社会运动的共同点在哪里。

Restorative justice (RJ) and Indigenous justice (IJ) are transforming responses to crime by emphasising informal processes and community-based decisions. With growth has come contestation over the potential benefits and pitfalls of these new justice forms. The project analyses evidence from Australia, New Zealand, and Canada in two areas: debates among feminist and victim advocacy groups on using RJ for sexual and physical violence, and debates among Indigenous and non-Indigenous people on the merits of IJ. The project will show when RJ is appropriate, what IJ practices are meaningful, and where common ground exists for feminist and Indigenous social movements.