A comprehensive study on the Kundoku(**) of Wen-hsuan(**) based on field survey of manuscript copies of Wen-hsuan(**) which still exist in Japan

《文选》是一部对日本古代学术文化产生重大影响的著作。然而，当我们实际将这种声誉与日本现存的手稿联系起来时，我们会发现，这种声誉在质量和数量上都不完全正确。通过这项研究，我成功地澄清了以下几点：1.目前存世的手稿数量少，数量参差不齐。每个注释者在抄写手稿时如何使用注解并不统一，层次也不同；有的使用得很深，有的只是肤浅的。记录文轩(**)在日本如何被接受的文章需要重新审查。奈良(**)时代文轩(**)存在贡都(**)的假说，应慎重讨论。

Wen-hsuan(**) is well known as a book which greatly influenced the academic culture in ancient Japan. However, when we actually refer this reputation to the manuscripts which exist in Japan, we see that this reputation is not exactly true both in quality and in quantity. I succeeded in clarifying the following points through this study;1. The number of manuscripts which still exist in presenet are few, and their volumes are uneven.2. How each annotator used the commentary when copying the manuscripts is not uniform and differs in level; some used profoundly but others only superficially.3. The articles those have recorded how Wen-hsuan(**) was accepted in Japan need to be re-examined.4. The hypothesis that there existed Kundoku(**) in Wen-hsuan(**) of Nara(**) era should be discussed with much more caution.