On Differences of Role of Delegatory Ordinances and Voluntarily Local Ordinancs

1在本研究中，我们首先关注地方性法规(风景名胜区条例和特殊用途条例等)，并评估这些法规与全国性法律的关系的特点；2我们其次关注自愿地方性法规，并将370个自愿地方性法规划分为几个模式，我们提取了两个模式；复合模式(多个条例的对象复合)和制度模式(其中一些条例被系统地适用)3我们根据2000年《城市规划法》的修订研究了代表权地方性法规的作用的扩大。4我们讨论了京都、札幌和神户的案例，它们都有统一管理代表权地方性法规和自愿地方性法规的安排，明确了代表权地方性法规和自愿地方性法规的作用差异

1 In this study we first focus on Delegatory Local Ordinances (Scenic Zone ordinances and Special Use ordinances and so on) and assess the characteristics of such ordinances with respect to their relations with national laws,2 We second focus on Voluntarily Local Ordinances and divide the 370 Voluntarily Local Ordinances into some patterns, We extract two patterns ; the compound pattern (in which several objects of ordinances are compounded) and system pattern, (in which some ordinances are applied systemalically)3 We study the enlargement of role of Delegatory Local Ordinances according to the amendment of City Planning Act in 2000,4 We discuss the case of Kyoto, Sapporo and Kobe which have arrangement for administrating Delegatory Local Ordinances and Voluntarily Local Ordinances in an integrated manner, We make clear about Differences of Role of Delegatory Local Ordinances and Voluntarily Local Ordinances