The judicial function of judicialethics and the application there of to the education and training of the legal profession

这个项目有两个目标。首先，通过对法律伦理在行动中的司法功能的研究，发展法律伦理理论的基础，为法学院法律职业的法律伦理培训提供必要的理论依据。第二，将法学研究的成果反馈到法学理论领域，从而为法学研究的新方法和相关理论的发展提供必要的材料。关于第一个目标，研究结果发表在Hanrei Times vol.1251（2007）上，并在2007年12月1日在东京举行的国际司法伦理研讨会上提出和讨论了进一步的研究结果。在研讨会上，介绍了“司法伦理作为最佳实践”的概念，关于这一概念的评论和讨论不断流入首席调查员、法官和日本法学院法律伦理教学负责人的手中。至于第二个目标，也是主要的发现……在上面的文章和研讨会中有更多的介绍。研究的主题是法日两国司法伦理的比较研究。其主要内容是，为了在自由民主主义社会中司法机关正常发挥作用，通过司法机关的独立性确保法律解释的自由是先决条件。在法国，虽然国家宪法并没有预期自由民主的司法机构所应有的那种独立，但司法机构的独立性仍然足以在总体上完成这种司法机构的任务。是什么使法官在解释法律时避免随意性？是什么使司法机构的信誉得以保存和提高？在此背景下对司法伦理的内容进行了分析，除了晋升动机、限制许可等可能的原因，特别是在上诉层面容易被推翻的解释外，还引入了司法伦理的精神，即司法的制度。政治条件和这种司法伦理精神的内容随后被提出进行批判性分析。我们认为，自由民主中可行的司法伦理的基本特征可以由此确立。如果是这样，那么可接受的和晚间的法律解释的内容和标准不仅应该通过法官发现法律的方法来确定，而且还通过司法独立的程度和法官的道德内容来过滤基于错误原因的推论。在未来对这一主题的研究中，这样一种法律解释的综合观点是必要的。我们相信，这样一种制度性的观点将为我们如何理论化法律及其解释带来一种革新。少

This project had two objectives. Firstly, to provide the theoretical grounds necessary far the legal ethics training of the legal profession at the law school by developing the foundations of such a theory thorough the study of the judicial function of legal ethics in action. Secondly, to feed back the fruits of the study to the field of legal theory, thus furnishing the material necessary for the developing of a new method of the study of law and accompanying theories.Concerning the first objective, findings are published in the Hanrei Times vol.1251 (2007) and further findings were presented and discussed at the International Symposium on Judicial Ethics held on 1 December 2007, in Tokyo. At the symposium, the concept of <judicial ethics as best practice> was introduced, about which comments and discussion continue to flow in to the chief investigator, from judges and those responsible for teaching legal ethics in law schools in Japan.As for the second objective, again, major finding … More s were presented in the above article and symposium. The main theme of the research was the comparative study of judicial ethics between France and Japan. The main message sent out was thus In order far the judiciary to properly function in a liberal democracy, freedom of legal interpretation secured through the independence of the judiciary is a prerequisite. In France, although the constitution of the state does not anticipate the type of independence fit far a judiciary of a liberal democracy, the judiciary is nevertheless independent enough to fulfill by and large the task of such a judiciary. What is it that enables the judge to avoid arbitrariness in the interpretation of law? What is it that allows for the preservation and enhancement of the credibility of the judiciary? The content of judicial ethics was analyzed in this context, In addition to the probable masons such as motivation to promotion inhibiting license, especially interpretations that tend to be overturned at the appellate level, the ethos the caps of the judiciary was introduced as another possible element The institutional, political conditions and the content of the ethos of such a judicial ethic were then proposed for critical analysis We believe that the fundamental characteristics of a viable judicial ethic in a liberal democracy can thus be established. If so, it would follow that the content and standard of acceptable and evening interpretation of law should be identified not only by the methods by which the judge finds the law, but also by the level of independence of the judiciary and the content of the ethics of the judge that filters out inference based on the wrong reasons Such an integrated view of legal interpretation would be necessary in future investigations of the subject We believe that such an institutional view would bring about a renovation of how we theorize about law and its interpretation. Less